Re: [IRCA] TP 8 Jul; Victoria version

[Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>]

I plan to monitor at home during the DXpeditions Gary, and I think Dennis wants
to also, so we will be able to see whether a better morning for us corresponds
to a better morning for you, or to reception from different areas.  Science at
its finest....

best wishes,

Nick




Quoting d1028gary@xxxxxxx:

> 
> Hi Nick,
> 
> <<<   Very weak and sparse carriers again this morning.   Hopefully 
> conditions will improve as the time for DXpeditions approaches.   >>>
> 
> Actually, Nick, for some unknown reason both of the Oregon cliff sites chosen
> for this month's DXpeditions seem to have a strange immunity to the DU
> propagation slowdowns that occur frequently near sea level. Over the last 3
> DXpeditions to Rockwork and Cape Perpetua I've enjoyed very good South
> Pacific reception on 11 out of 11 days, although the favored areas of
> reception shift back and forth between New Zealand and Australia.
> 
> 73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> 
>    
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
> <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Mon, Jul 8, 2013 8:34 am
> Subject: [IRCA] TP 8 Jul; Victoria version
> 
> 
> Very weak and sparse carriers again this morning.   Hopefully 
> conditions will approve as the time for DXpeditions approaches
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at by
> cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music) :
> 
> 
> 738 man talking 1136UT, too weak for language guess
> 
> 
> Strongish het, no or "near imaginary"audio (either undermodulated or 
> ravaged by splatter):
> 
> 1008 1098 1278 1503
> 
> 
> 
> best wishes,
> 
> Nick
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
> 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 


-- 
NHP

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx