Re: [IRCA] TA, early TP in Victoria
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] TA, early TP in Victoria



Of course 1575 can also have Radio Farda on in the mornings here (west
coast North America) and VOA Thailand (and AFN Japan).  Not exactly TA,
more like trans-Polar path.....Walt

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Bruce Portzer <bportzer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
> Offhand, 747 might be the best bet for hearing a TA & TP on the same
> frequency at the same time.  JOIB sometimes fades in around 0600, when
> Holland would still have a darkness path to this part of the world (during
> this time of year, anyway).
>
>
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
> From: "Nick Hall-Patch" <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011 10:45:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] TA, early TP in Victoria
>
> There can be a darkness path to both western
> Europe and northeastern Asia simultaneously at
> this time of year, but the only time I recall
> hearing audio from both on one channel (swinging
> the loop from one to the other), was in the '70s,
> when BBC on 647 (in those days) gave way to a
> Soviet Far East station....something worth
> remembering, as it's never happened since.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
> At 13:29 02-12-11, you wrote:
> >I was noticing your times being close together
> >for TPs and TAs, and was thinking...
> >
> >Has anyone ever heard a TP *AND* a TA (each with
> >strong enough audio to trip a seek/scan
> >function, or continuously peg a Tecsun radio's
> >S/N indicator) simultaneously competing on the
> >same frequency?  (Bonus points if it's on a
> >divisible-by-90 frequency and wipes out a local
> >that normally indicates upwards of 88-94 dBu
> >(on-channel, plus 50/00 at least ±100 kHz) on a
> >stock Si4734-based radio ;) or is that not possible?)
> >
> >On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 11:12 PM PST Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
> >
> > >Not much evidence of TA's this evening until
> > after 0600UT, when weak carriers appeared on
> > channels such as 945 (5 carriers), 1089 (3
> > carriers) 1215 (2 carriers) ,1107 (4 carriers),
> > 1116 (2 carriers), 1269 (just one)....but at by
> > 0615UT, carriers were also appearing  on TP
> > channels such as 747, 774 and 1287, with fair
> > audio (JJ talk by man) by 0655UT on 774;  279 had weak audio also.
> > >
> > >best wishes,
> > >
> > >Nick
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >IRCA mailing list
> > >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing
> > list are those of the original contributors and
> > do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >IRCA mailing list
> >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing
> >list are those of the original contributors and
> >do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx