Re: [IRCA] TA, early TP in Victoria

[Bruce Portzer <bportzer@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Offhand, 747 might be the best bet for hearing a TA & TP on the same frequency at the same time.  JOIB sometimes fades in around 0600, when Holland would still have a darkness path to this part of the world (during this time of year, anyway). 



Bruce 



----- Original Message -----


From: "Nick Hall-Patch" <nhp@xxxxxxxx> 
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011 10:45:25 AM 
Subject: Re: [IRCA] TA, early TP in Victoria 

There can be a darkness path to both western 
Europe and northeastern Asia simultaneously at 
this time of year, but the only time I recall 
hearing audio from both on one channel (swinging 
the loop from one to the other), was in the '70s, 
when BBC on 647 (in those days) gave way to a 
Soviet Far East station....something worth 
remembering, as it's never happened since. 

best wishes, 

Nick 


At 13:29 02-12-11, you wrote: 
>I was noticing your times being close together 
>for TPs and TAs, and was thinking... 
> 
>Has anyone ever heard a TP *AND* a TA (each with 
>strong enough audio to trip a seek/scan 
>function, or continuously peg a Tecsun radio's 
>S/N indicator) simultaneously competing on the 
>same frequency?  (Bonus points if it's on a 
>divisible-by-90 frequency and wipes out a local 
>that normally indicates upwards of 88-94 dBu 
>(on-channel, plus 50/00 at least ±100 kHz) on a 
>stock Si4734-based radio ;) or is that not possible?) 
> 
>On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 11:12 PM PST Nick Hall-Patch wrote: 
> 
> >Not much evidence of TA's this evening until 
> after 0600UT, when weak carriers appeared on 
> channels such as 945 (5 carriers), 1089 (3 
> carriers) 1215 (2 carriers) ,1107 (4 carriers), 
> 1116 (2 carriers), 1269 (just one)....but at by 
> 0615UT, carriers were also appearing  on TP 
> channels such as 747, 774 and 1287, with fair 
> audio (JJ talk by man) by 0655UT on 774;  279 had weak audio also. 
> > 
> >best wishes, 
> > 
> >Nick 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >_______________________________________________ 
> >IRCA mailing list 
> >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> > 
> >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing 
> list are those of the original contributors and 
> do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> > 
> >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> > 
> >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > 
> 
> 
>_______________________________________________ 
>IRCA mailing list 
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing 
>list are those of the original contributors and 
>do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 



_______________________________________________ 
IRCA mailing list 
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx