Re: [IRCA] Oklahoma TP's 11/17/10 - correction

["Richard Allen" <richarda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The signal from JOAB faded out at 1327 UTC, not 1317 as originally stated.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Richard Allen 
  To: IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 8:07 AM
  Subject: [IRCA] Oklahoma TP's 11/17/10


  TP signals were better, and different, this morning.  

  Receiver: Modified Tecsun PL-310 with 7.5-inch loopstick.  Local sunrise at 1309 UTC.

  594  JOAK Tokyo J, 1241-1326, fair.
  693  JOAB Tokyo J, 1245-1319, fair; het fading away at 1317.
  702  unID, 1223, weak het.
  774  JOUB Akita J, 1214-1322, fair.
  828  JOBB Osaka J, 1231, strong het; 1307, man JJ, poor.
  873  JOGB Kumamoto J, 1304, man JJ, fair.
  972  unID (HLCA?), 1211, weak het (QRM: KBUL 970); 1252, ear splitting het (QRM: XEJ 970).
  1053 unID, 1255, weak carrier; 1310, barely audible talk, fading away at 1311.
  1134 JOQR Tokyo J, 1257-1258, man JJ, poor.
  1242 unID (JOLF?), 1309, weak het; 1316, fair het.

  Signals seemed to benefit from a "sunrise lift" with JOAB/JOAK/JOUB being heard later than before this fall.  I wish I'd listened more closely to 1053 kHz. Overall, anytime I can hear Asian signals in Oklahoma is considered pretty good. 

  I hope the folks west of me have a good morning of TP DX.

  Richard Allen
  36°22'51"N / 97°26'35"W
  (near Perry OK USA)
  _______________________________________________
  IRCA mailing list
  IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

  Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

  For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

  To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx