[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] TP for 30 Aug from Victoria, BC
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP for 30 Aug from Victoria, BC
- From: "Kevin S" <satya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
I actually wrested myself from my pillow for a listen this morning as
well, from 1230-1305. I had brief periods of decent Asian audio on 747,
972, the off-freq CC on 1206, and 1566. 594 has some nice hets but never
materialized - the same with 693/774/1575. 1116, presumed DU, also had a
chance early on but fizzled out.
73 - Kevin S
Bainbridge Island, WA
> Listened from 1245 to 1305UT, and things still pretty much exclusively
> Asian, except that there was a definite Aussie fading up over JOAK on 594,
> the only one noted today.
>
> pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, at
> least
> briefly):
>
> none
>
>
> reasonable audio at times during the period (much of it understandable
> by a
> native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):
>
> HLAZ-1566
>
>
> not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or noise
> could be
> understood by a native speaker
>
> 594 3WV, definite DU talk fading up and over JOAK about 1256UT
> 774 JOUB
>
>
>
> Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at
> by
> cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music) :
>
> 153 R. Rossii (153, 180, 189, 234 and 279 had all been weakly audible at
> 1100UT)
> 279 mx R. Rossii
> 594 was JOAK by direction and inflection
> 747 JOIB at 1302
> 828 JOBB //774
> 972 big carrier, man talking, likely HLCA
> 1287 JOHR?
>
> Strongish het, no audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by splatter):
>
> 567, 1053, 1134, 1251, all Asiatic
>
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
> *****************************
> Nick Hall-Patch
> Victoria, BC
> Canada
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx