Re: [IRCA] TP for 27 Aug from Victoria, BC

[D1028Gary@xxxxxxx]

Derek and All,
 
After having a chance to listen carefully to the 846 kHz ABC  station MP3 
recorded during the Lincoln City DXpedition, I noted that at  1:02 into the 
recording there is indeed an "RN" spoken after the ABC network ID,  so this 
is apparently the 10 kw 2RN station in Canberra.
 
This is yet another Aussie that never produced a trace for John B. or  me, 
during 7 combined ULR DXpeditions to Grayland.
 
73, Gary 
 
 
In a message dated 8/27/2010 2:05:04 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
D1028Gary@xxxxxxx writes:

Hi  Derek,

The ABC 846 kHz station was only received on the exceptional  morning of  
8-20 in Lincoln City, and not at all on the other two  days last week (8-21 
and 
8-22).

During both recent Oregon trips I  made a serious effort to check DU's on  
909 kHz for your UnID country  music, but there was always nasty domestic  
splatter from 910 kHz  (presumably Vancouver, WA) along the NW Oregon  
coast. It 
was one of  the noisiest split frequencies on the band,  unfortunately.

73,  Gary 

In a message dated 8/27/2010 11:40:35 A.M. Pacific Daylight  Time,  
eargazimm@xxxxxxx writes:

Thanks  Gary for the 846  ID. It's one of the few I've been trying to  
track  down from  last year.. Now it's on to the unid 909khz

Thank   you.....

Derek Vincent

Vmedia360.......everywhere

On  Aug  27, 2010, at 10:29 AM, D1028Gary@xxxxxxx wrote:

> Hi   Nick,
>
> Your 846 kHz Australian station was received at a  fairly  strong level
> during my ULR DXpedition to Lincoln City,  Oregon last  week. This  
> recording on
> 846 contains  an ABC ID, but I  didn't check an RN parallel. It was  
> the  first
> DU I'd  ever heard on 846.
>
>   _http://www.mediafire.com/?yo9773c0zq5us6i_
>   (http://www.mediafire.com/?yo9773c0zq5us6i)
>
> 73,   Gary
>
>
> In a message dated 8/27/2010 6:18:47 A.M.  Pacific  Daylight Time,
> nhp@xxxxxxxx writes:
>
>  Burbles  in  the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might  be  
> guessed  at
> by
> cadence of talk, or  parallel established by changes in  talk or  
> music)   :
>
> 594 seemed JOAK by  direction
> 612  later  on, 4QR by  direction
> 702   at 1309, DU direction, so  2BL
> 747 later on, JOIB by   direction
> 774 JOUB by  direction
> 828 JOBB by direction
>  846  DU by   direction, woman talking in the murk; 2RN likely; not  too
> strong  a carrier so  well modulated?
>
>
>   _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing   list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>  Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of  the  
>  original contributors and do not necessarily reflect  the opinion of   
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff,  or officers
>
>  For more information:  http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a  message:   irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA   mailing   list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions   expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original   contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
IRCA,  
its  editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more  information:  http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message:   irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA  mailing  list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, 
its  editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information:  http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message:  irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx