[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] TP loggings from Masset for 10 July, 2010: DU all the way!
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP loggings from Masset for 10 July, 2010: DU all the way!
- From: WALTER SALMANIW <salmaniw@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:03:31 +0000 (GMT)
- Content-language: en
- Priority: normal
Unlike Neil, I use the side bands to get away from the IBOC hash. It's very easy to spot on the Perseus waterfall screen as 2 wide bands on each side of the carrier. One usually can eliminate or reduce greatly the hash by tuning either USB or LSB depending on which side it's on, but I agree, using AM and tuning away a few kHz probably works just as well........Walt
----- Original Message -----
From: Chuck Hutton <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, July 11, 2010 17:16
Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP loggings from Masset for 10 July, 2010: DU all the way!
To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> And if it is KRKO IBOC, 1395 should be clear by using USB since
> IBOC uses 15 kHz.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
> > From: ptdx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:49:31 -0700
> > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP loggings from Masset for 10 July, 2010:
> DU all the way!
> >
> > Walt,
> >
> > Just curious: If KRKO's IBOC hash trashes 1395, why doesn't it
> affect the same level TP on 1386?
> >
> > Pete Taylor
> > Tacoma, WA
> > 12225w 4719n
> > HQ180 & ICF2010
> > Kiwa aircore & Palomar loops
> > DX398, SRF-59 & M37V
> > Eton E100 + Tecsun PL-300
> > ============================
> > WALTER SALMANIW wrote:
> >
> > > 1386: 7 level NHK2 with QDFA at 12:49
> > > 1395: 7 level with +++IBOC hash
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those
> of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the
> opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of
> the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the
> opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx