[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] BANFF Band
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] BANFF Band
- From: "Tim Hall" <timhall1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:06:08 -0700
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx designates 64.15.155.228 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@xxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=49c+sUav5f6TJOf/fokXonsglpmD2eMzNdYpfkFcq94=; b=Dglzg54QbJl5eq63w4Q8zyM2NZOdT8avAfNpWDH905hd6beW/mRJEO4WF5uWramBiz +57vE2ihYu4mwKi7kirq/gHeArliJJS6DEw0b9rIjnf43jaPuOTjiTdgLnX0SYqNdLU2 MwmH6TO7VyxV/VqcHNPQx+nODISkFHZN4t16o=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=nEM6xwRHYrmo7WpjjPr3FfpEOAseJ3GirSAUdKvNobOdDYaLnqM7JqxL7RwAzCjIrD +vHKCyTysJvXyG+OPp4aokXuypUjoFAGUspEbN+fISi4Ug3f/MrBGTn8Hx162jqWMeBv p5ja5oouMUuPyWwPUcXQC4D6em1Cu8XF/Lc1k=
Ah, that's right - take the gondolas up to the top of the mountain at Banff
and Jasper. I remember at Banff in 2005, the midday reception was a lot
better up there. Sunset would be interesting! 73, Tim
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:42 AM, C B <bevdxer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That's a great idea. An equivalent spot in that area is "The Whistlers"
> just outside of Jasper. The added bonus of course is an incredible 360
> degree view of the Canadian Rockies. I also went up there during the latter
> half of September and had picture perfect weather. I hope you enjoy the
> trip, it's a beautiful area.
>
> Craig Barnes
> Wondervu, CO
>
>
> --- On Mon, 6/23/08, HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS <DAVID.HASCALL@xxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > From: HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS <DAVID.HASCALL@xxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [IRCA] BANFF Band
> > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Monday, June 23, 2008, 8:28 AM
> > Pete - Not sure about AM but the high peaks might be a hoot
> > on FM or on
> > a portable TV. As a kid (in the 70's), I heard of a
> > DX'er who drove up
> > Mount Mitchell in NC. He had stations on every TV channel
> > well up into
> > the upper UHF band.
> >
> > Fast forward to 1989. I was vacationing out in Colorado
> > and was on
> > Pikes Peak. I got out an old 5" portable TV set that
> > I brought along
> > just to see if I could replicate the North Carolina
> > DX'ers feat. Man!
> > Every channel from 2 to way up in the 50's had
> > *something." Colorado,
> > Wyoming, Nebraska, Kansas, Panhandles of TX and OK and NM,
> > too, IIRC.
> > There was no tropo to speak of and no Es. I was not even
> > at the summit!
> > FM stations out to 150 miles with no apparent tropospheric
> > enhancement.
> > The signals did drop as I went lower.
> >
> > That may be fun for you to try.
> >
> > 73,
> > Dave in Indy
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:17:00 -0700
> > From: Pete Taylor <ptdx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [IRCA] BANFF BAND
> > To: IRCA of America <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, NRC
> > <am@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID:
> > <8B858D62-359A-46B0-AADC-A493A5B816E1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes;
> > format=flowed
> >
> > We will be driving up to Banff, AB for a week
> > mid-September. I will
> > be bringing the 2010 and the Palomar loop so am curious as
> > to what to
> > expect on the AM band. Is it a deathly location for AM DX
> > because of
> > the mountainous terrain? Also, it is a long haul up there
> > from Tacoma
> > so we will probably spend the night somewhere midway. Is it
> > worth the
> > time getting off Canada #1 to visit Kelowna?
> >
> > Pete Taylor
> > Tacoma, WA
> > 12225w 4719n
> > HQ180 + Kiwa air core loop
> > ICF2010 + " " " "
> > DX398; Palomar loop
> > SRF-59 & SRF M37V
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are
> > those of the original contributors and do not necessarily
> > reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing
> > staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx