Re: [IRCA] TPs for 3 Dec

["Don Moman VE6JY" <ve6jy.1@xxxxxxxxx>]

It seemed to be a fair morning here,didn't spend too much time at it but
 listening at 1530 there were hets everywhere and excellent audio from 1566
and 1593.  1566 still had a good het at 1735 ut.  The results are skewed a
bit since the 1000 foot JA beverage didn't seem to produce nearly as much
signal as the 160m dipole did.  However the dipole feed  has a built in
bandpass filter  that reduces signal in the mw spectrum, so only signals at
the top of the band had a chance to get thru the rolloff. We have no locals
above 930 khz (1260 is almost DX here at night) so that makes a good
combination.

In spite of the quiet conditions, it was not any kind of a good TA opening
 as no carriers noted at any time during the day.  I didn't listen after
sunset.

73 Don
VE6JY
Lamont, Alberta

On Dec 4, 2007 5:27 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Not much time this morning; a quick listen at 1410UT, and the
> impression was a better morning than yesterday,  though still not
> much in the way of second string audios
>
> Asian unless indicated otherwise:
>
>
> Darn good audio, if briefly:  828
>
> Reasonable audio  (though often battling w/splash):  594, 747, 774, 1287
>
> Not so reasonable audio, occasional words in splash or noise:  567,
> 612 DU, 873, 1377 CNR1, 1566
>
> Burbles in the splatter: 558, 639 DU?, 738, 1134, 1188, 1323
>
> strong carrier, no audio:
>
>
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> Nick Hall-Patch
> Victoria, B.C.
> Canada
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx