[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] WCXH-780 DX Test
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] WCXH-780 DX Test
- From: "Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:09:27 -0600
Hopefully you can pick out some of the same from some of the west coast
members' audio clips.
It would be great if we have 100% confirmation that NE Maine made it to the
west coast.
73 KAZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Ratzlaff" <steveratz@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America"
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] WCXH-780 DX Test
>I wasn't able to participate in the test, but I've listened to both Bill's
> and Barry's audio clips of the morse code--transcription follows:
> WCXH WCXH WCHX MONTICELLO, MAINE WCXH WCXH WCXH (14 upward-sweep tones
> follow the code)
> Note the third code group is an erroneous transposition of the station
> callsign! The speed indeed is slow--one could write the dots and dashes
> down
> and then decipher them afterwards with a code table, even if one didn't
> know
> the code, at that slow speed. LF NDB's use similar slow code for that very
> reason--the pilot can copy the dots and dashes and look up the ident if he
> really wants to verify the signal on a particular frequency is the one
> he's
> expecting.
> The use of a comma (dah dah di di dah dah) following the city is not often
> heard. I used to copy the merchant marine press broadcasts sent to ships
> at
> sea--since the copy being broadcast was machine-generated, it used all the
> various morse code punctuation characters--parentheses, semicolons, etc.
> Most of those characters would only be heard on those press broadcasts and
> nowhere else.
> Best regards,
> Steve AA7U
> NE Oregon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Pogue" <KH2AR@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America'"
> <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 3:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] WCXH-780 DX Test
>
>
>>I prepared the code and indeed it was 10 wpm.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of Barry McLarnon
>> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 8:05 PM
>> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] WCXH-780 DX Test
>>
>> Since there seems to be some confusion about the nature of the code
>> (tone frequency, speed) sent during this test, I thought it would be
>> useful to post a clip that you folks out west can use for comparison
>> to what you heard:
>> http://topazdesigns.com/ambc/audio/wcxh-780-0450-24nov07.mp3
>>
>> It sounds very close to 1 kHz to me, and maybe 10 wpm or so. There
>> are also some sweeps at the end of the clip.
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> --
>> Barry McLarnon VE3JF Ottawa, ON
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx