[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] [am] NAB wants it both ways
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] [am] NAB wants it both ways
- From: Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
--- Craig Healy <bubba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In a news article I received today, David Rehr, the head of the
> National
> Association of Broadcasters (NAB) is commenting on low power FM
> stations
> (LPFM). The context is that of Congress removing the requirements
> that
> third adjacent stations be protected. His comment from the Inside
> Radio
> mailing is:
>
> -=-=-=-=-
> In a letter to lawmakers, Rehr says broadcasters "do not oppose
> the licensing of LPFM stations" but they do oppose "the introduction
> of
> thousands of micro-radio stations that would cause significant
> harmful
> interference."
> -=-=-=-=-
>
> I would love for Mr. Rehr to explain how the IBOC first adjacent
> digital
> radio stations do not count as "..thousands of micro-radio stations
> that
> would cause significant harmful interference."
>
This clearly shows their duplicity, greed, denial, etc. I certainly
hope that the representatives of and advocates for LPFM pick up on that
as well...
Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop
____________________________________________________________________________________
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx