[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Stopping bad Radio
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Stopping bad Radio
- From: "Craig Healy" <bubba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:51:11 -0400
- Organization: Hazzard gang
I ask for comments, additions, and/or corrections to this list. I intend to
post it on my web site.
Craig Healy
Providence, RI
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Reasons why HD Radio is bad for radio, and AM specifically.
* The digital signals on either side of their assigned frequency damage
other stations.
* Coverage is far inferior to the analog signal and easily disrupted by
electrical noise.
* The interference generated may block EAS warnings.
* The FCC has mandated a closed, proprietary system, rather than open
standards.
* Adoption of this will make perhaps a half billion analog radios obsolete.
* The AM band does not penetrate steel and concrete buildings well.
* Night skywave propagation allows stations hundreds of miles away to
interfere.
* The supposed improvement in sound is of lesser quality than analog of 50
years ago.
* It requires antennas beyond what the average person has or wants.
* The receivers are too expensive and are not portable.
* Smaller stations can not afford the equipment or licensing.
* Some directional stations may not be able to meet the technical
requirements.
* It opens the door to pay-per-listen radio, removing free public airwaves.
* The two digital carriers would not be allowed under analog FCC allocation
rules.
* Updating the technology would be impossible, unlike computer software.
* The radios are not selling. Some that are sold are returned as
"defective".
* The interference removes peoples' ability to listen to more distant
stations.
* Neighboring countries will suffer interference.
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx