[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Re IRCA 41-128-4
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Re IRCA 41-128-4
- From: "Scott Fybush" <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:47:38 -0400 (EDT)
> When 740 in Toronto was still CBL with the single TX tower in Milton about
> 30 miles west of Downtown Toronto,their signal was the weakest of all the
> Metro area AMers and was not strong enough to cover electrical
> noise,giving rise to the move of the CBC to FM off the CN tower.Unless
> CHWO has Directionalised their TX then their signal towards Toronto and
> further east would not be feasable for listeners in that area.It could be
> that they have new hardware and upgraded equipment for a better signal.At
> night the signal on 740 would easily reach the Atlantic coast.--Bill in BC
CHWO is still ND from that same tower out in Hornby. The difference is,
they're processing their audio more aggressively than CBL ever did, so the
signal has a punch that it completely lacked in the CBC days. The only
area where it's really a problem is along the streetcar lines on Queen and
King downtown, where most AM is messy these days.
s
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx