Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

["Gerry Bishop" <gerryb4991@xxxxxxx>]

The Law of Unintended Consequences is joyously salivating for an
incandescent ban.  

Gerry Bishop
Niceville, FL

-----Original Message-----
From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Milspec390@xxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:28 AM
To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFB (Compact Florescent Blubs)

B -
 
 This is what some RI legislator proposes. CA leads way, along w/couple
other 
states. Bans set several years into future - in tradition adopted during 90s

- subsequent to couple election cycles. They know exactly what they're
doing. 
State by state thing. 
 
  Rooftop beacons here use incandescents, CFB's not recommended. Little 
things like that escape their notice when crafting one size-a-she-feet-all
rules by 
which all must eventually strangle themselves. 
 
  Bored? Let's make some more rules!
 
 

   z



************************************** See what's free at
http://www.aol.com.
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx