Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: DRM vs IBOC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: DRM vs IBOC



--- Chuck Hutton <charlesh3@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Nothing could be farther from the truth. AM is immensely worse, and
> whoever
> told you that should be placed in the category of "unreliable
> witness".
> 
> 
>

Chuck is correct.

Decent-to-strong tropo and/or E-skip on FM will usually p[enetrate the
FM IBOC hash here, and most of the Philadelphia FM's are about 7-10
miles from me. 

On AM, I can't hear a formerly-regular daytimer at all on first
adjacent, and I suspect the result would be the same if the distance
were only 50 miles.

Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
The fish are biting. 
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx