[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: DRM vs IBOC
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: DRM vs IBOC
- From: "Chuck Hutton" <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:29:36 -0700
- Thread-index: Acduk8D209dPQOhgTtOR0+LlTWYPuQACqWUA
Nothing could be farther from the truth. AM is immensely worse, and whoever
told you that should be placed in the category of "unreliable witness".
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Patrick Martin
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 9:09 PM
To: am@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: am@xxxxxxxxxxx; Mailing list for theInternational Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: DRM vs IBOC
Scott,
Even though I have not detected IBOC Hash from any FM's I can hear on
the coast from Portland & Seattle, I am told the adjacent is just as bad
as on AM in metro areas. Do you find that true?
73,
Patrick
Patrick Martin
KAVT Reception Manager
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx