Re: [IRCA] WOR Curiosity

["chris and anne" <tantwo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Scott...How about WBZ and WWL ?????        Chris     K4NHL    S.C.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Fybush" <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" 
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] WOR Curiosity


>> I'm curious if WOR is directional during the day to protect
>> another station or to put a stronger signal over a particular
>> area?
>
> WOR's original directional antenna was put in place in the mid-30s to
> strengthen the signal over both New York and Philadelphia. The move north
> from Carteret to Lyndhurst in 1967 altered the pattern to favor New York
> with less of a Philadelphia lobe.
>
> New stations have come on the air in WOR's nulls over the years in such a
> way that WOR couldn't go back to 50 kW ND now if it wanted to. (There are
> only two mainland US stations now operating 50 kW DA that could go ND just
> for the asking...can anyone name them?)
>
> s
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx