[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] DDXD-W / New TIS/HAR (or Part 15 or ???) in Chula Vista, CA
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] DDXD-W / New TIS/HAR (or Part 15 or ???) in Chula Vista, CA
- From: AM-DXer@xxxxxxxxx (Patrick Griffith, N0NNK / WPE9HVW)
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:42:09 -0600
The CalTrans station WNSB415 in South San Diego (CA-905 @Beyer Blvd.
between I-5 and I-805), which has moved from 1610 to 530 to 1700 to
1620, has a huge signal on 1620. This must be more than 10 watts. They
hold their own against XEUT-1630, which is nowhere near the blowtorch
they used to be.
/////
WNSB415 is licensed at 10 watts. But the license shows a "tower" antenna
instead of the usual "pole" antenna. In the case of TIS listings, my
experience has been that "tower" usually refers to one of the ValCom
self-supporting antennas. These almost always have a superior signal
compared to the "pole" equipped TIS stations. Here in Denver we have a
10 watt TIS that uses a ValCom "tower" and the FCC actually lists its
ERP as 40 watts.
I agree that XEUT is certainly not what they use to be. In 2001 they
were huge here. I received a really nice QSL package from them back
then.
Patrick Griffith, Westminster CO
http://community.webtv.net/N0NNK/
http://community.webtv.net/AM-DXer/
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx