[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] BOG made to a BUG
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] BOG made to a BUG
- From: "Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:35:54 -0500
So what Chuck is telling you is the same as Nike...Just Do It !!
But if you can compare to a BOG not buried we'd all appreciate it. 73 KAZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Hutton" <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
To: "'Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America'"
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] BOG made to a BUG
> It should make no noticeable difference in theory, which seemed a whole
> lot
> easier than burying 600' of wire.....
>
> The standard method for evaluating how far RF penetrates into ground is to
> calculate the depth where it has fallen to 37% of its level at the
> surface.
>
> That depth depends on soil and frequency. At 1 MHz with average soil, it's
> about 25 feet.
>
> Sounds like you could even dig down a few feet if you get carried away.
>
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Bill Harms
> Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 10:47 AM
> To: mwdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; am@xxxxxxxxxxx; irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> amfmtvdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [IRCA] BOG made to a BUG
>
> I think that someone brought this up a while back, but what about
> going one step further and burying a BOG under a 1/4 to 1/2 inch of
> soil? I am seriously considering doing just that as an experiment.
> That would be an easy way to hide an antenna especially in areas with
> lots of traffic. Has anyone done this? I am talking about distances
> of over 500 feet, or perhaps 1000 feet. Since this would be
> "underground" would it be more properly called a BUG (Beverage
> UnderGound) antenna.
>
> Bill Harms
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx