[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] QRM or QRN
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] QRM or QRN
- From: Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
--- J999w@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>
> I think many, including myself, consider line noise - QRN (noise)
> rather than
> QRM (splatter from another transmitter).
>
>
*** There's no doubt that over the years this has become more accepted
as an interpretation, although my understanding is that originally the
'M' signified "man-made" and the 'N' signified "natural".
While 'N' can also signify "noise", there's no analogue for the
significane of using 'M' for interference from other stations.
Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20ID
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx