[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] KDWN ratings
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] KDWN ratings
- From: Scott Fybush <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:17:57 -0400
Doug Pifer-desert4wd.com wrote:
> Scott, thanks for the info on their future location.
>
> It just seems odd, because KDWN should be a western powerhouse with a big
> regional presence. A booming city and nothing good to talk about or put on
> the air. ??
> 73- Doug
It's evidence, I think, that a local standalone owner is not always the
right answer, and that a good signal still doesn't do much with
substandard programming.
Vegas is a booming city, yes - and especially on the FM dial, where
there have been something like a half-dozen new full-market signals
since the late eighties, plus at least that many new rimshots.
And since so much of the population is new to the city every year, a big
promotions budget is absolutely essential to let potential new listeners
know the station's there, especially when there's so little else on AM
to draw an audience away from FM. My experience, on repeated trips to
Vegas, is that there's absolutely no promotion for KDWN. The only thing
that might have drawn new listeners was the station's Dodgers
broadcasts, and even those weren't terribly well publicized. I'm not
even sure they had the rights this year.
Beasley at least has the money and the promotional platform (from its
other three FMs) to build 720 back into something closer to the regional
presence it ought to be.
Las Vegas is, generally, a difficult town to do radio (and especially
news-talk radio) in. It's very transient, so there's less of an overall
common interest to talk about. You're as likely to find a transplanted
New Yorker who's a Yankees fan as to find a fan of the Dodgers or the
Angels. Voting levels tend to be very low, reflecting a lack of interest
in politics. So you end up talking a lot about casinos and development
and traffic and housing prices. It gets stale after a while.
There's also the little problem of drive time - in a 24-hour city,
listenership is spread out much more through the dayparts than in most
other markets. Spend a lot on a big morning show, and half the market
will never hear it (or perhaps they'll hear it on their drive home after
the night shift!)
And even with the best AM signal in the market (by far), even 720
doesn't have a prayer of getting heard clearly in the RF mess around the
Strip.
It's not, in short, a sure thing - and having corporate deep pockets to
draw on while the station finds its feet should be a good thing, indeed.
s
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx