[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Wobbler in NE Oregon (again)
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Wobbler in NE Oregon (again)
- From: "W. Curt Deegan" <WWWR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:21:42 -0500
Bob,
When you say that the Wobbler fades, how do you mean that. It normally
varies in intensity as a matter of its nature, coming and going as well as
the amplitude of the fluctuations varies. This behavior is unrelated to
the strength of the broadcast signal.
I have 1100//1120 but 1080 is covered by a local. 1100 & 1120 are about
equal at listenable levels tonight -- 1100 may actually be stronger in
general -- different from previously where 1100 was very weak at night and
imperceptible during the day. The improvement in 1100 is possibly because
of whatever was done while it was off yesterday.
1100 does fade in and out some, but not severely. As has been seen with
Wobblers in general, they can be heard when program audio can not, so just
because the audio has faded would not necessarily mean the Wobbler should
have. During the day all I can hear on 1100 is the Wobbler.
Tonight, especially since you mentioned this, I've been listening in
various modes trying to detect fading of the Wobbler. The broadcast signal
does fade some, but I've not been able to detect any fading in the Wobbler,
as I understand your meaning. When it's there it's there, even though the
fluctuations may be slight and causing only a low rumble. I may be too
close to detect an overall fade in the Wobbler.
But I may be misunderstanding your point entirely. I'll keep listening
with this notion in mind.
Curt
-------
W. Curt Deegan
Boca Raton, (southeast) FL
At 09:36 PM 1/24/2006, you wrote:
> > Yup, it's back. 0211 utc, first noted here, 1100 kHz. Brief fadeup at
>good
> > level, then much weaker with occasional fadeups. Much lower pitched
>than
> > before.
> > Steve
>
>
>I am hearing the 1100 wobbler in Tampa tonight, about 0230z,
>the Cuban triplets 1080-1100-1120 are all in with // audio
>and varying strengths due to fading. What is interesting is
>the 1100 wobbler fade pattern here has no correlation to the
>strength of the 1100 RCH programming. IOW the RCH can
>be heard well with wobbler weak/out, or vice versa, or
>both well together.
>
>Two wacky possibilities (1) wobbler amplitude varies at a
>rate similar to fading artifacts or (2) wobbler geo. source is not
>the same as the 1100 RCH geo site, thus differing fade
>behavior. Or thirdly, it is possible for two RF signals from the
>same site and freq to fade independently?. (shades of C M Stanbury!)
>
>Is anyone who is able to hear the signal i.e. 1100 RCH able
>to get a better correlation between program fade behavior and
>wobbler fade behavior?
>
>- Bob Tampa sent 2136 et
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx