[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Sync Detection Question
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Sync Detection Question
- From: Rick Kunath <k9ao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:04:53 -0500
On Monday 16 January 2006 03:37 pm, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
>
> Certainly, not nearly as effective as the selectable sideband sync of the
> ICF-2010.
>
I have to second this opinion on the 2010 sync detector.
I don't have any Drake gear any more, but on the AOR (AR-5000+3, AR-7030 Plus)
and JRC (NRD-545) gear I use these days I find much the same thing. The ECSS
(synchronous) detection does little for DX audio enhancement. It does help a
lot on stronger SW and MW stations, but for digging deep into the noise it
isn't really very effective. I have no complaints on the synchronous
detectors in any of the gear I own mind you, they seem to really hold on
well, they just aren't as effective for real DX-type signals.
What seems to work better for me is simply using USB or LSB and varying the
passband tuning to get the frequency response I want and then to roll off the
opposite sideband interference.
This is exalted-carrier reception. Synchronous detection takes this one step
further by phase-locking the reinserted carrier to the received carrier. This
may be the problem with DX conditions. Perhaps the circuit really can't get a
complete lock on a signal that weak with other cariers in the passband.
Whatever the cause, on my equipment here I find that ordinary exalted-carrier
mode in USB or LSB is superior. Tuning is a bit more critical to avoid tonal
distortion, but not overly so.
I feed a TimeWave 599zx audio DSP filter with these receivers and see another
improvement most of the time using the TimeWave too. As for the JRC DSP, it
isn't of any use most of the time.
Rick Kunath
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx