[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Quantum Phaser continued
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Quantum Phaser continued
- From: "Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:45:49 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=T9zpXvXgT8wGyjJygbCpz3jsVhHSSiWviBsr/CkMhjbiRX4ENSKHE+4ZDaIu6Wow; h=Received:Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Here near Chicago, I have enough gain, although I might like a bit more
daytimes. In Wisconsin I could use some more daytimes, but not at night when
I get huge signals from across Lake Michigan. An idea for you Pat is to
restore the unit to normal and hook your Palstar preselector in line with
it, doesn't that also amp ?
73 KAZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Martin" <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <am@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <am@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Quantum Phaser continued
> Mike,
>
> Gerry suggested a .01-.1 cap across a couple of points on the circuit
> board. There apparently is a circuit in his unit to increase the dynamic
> range, but causes a bit of a loss. I lost 5 DB. The .1 works the best
> out of the .01/.047/.1 I bought. The loss is gone, but the unit is a bit
> too hot even here. If you want to, I will send you the pix of the board.
> Gerry is sending out a sheet to everyone that bought one anyway, since I
> called this to his attention. If you live in an RF free area, you might
> not want the 5 DB loss. I would not do this change if you live in an
> area with lots of RF though.
>
> 73,
>
> Patrick
>
> Patrick Martin
> Home of the 2006 IRCA Convention
> Seaside Oregon!
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx