[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 12-18 (Preliminary)
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 12-18 (Preliminary)
- From: Volodya S <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 18:09:26 +0000
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IPmIsnv6oIzkEPAGGwQe38YPOdaDT18H3YOv4Zuz9us=; b=qQqu5rQ/O83NAmPfwBXlI5TkUbEPVn9NTjRTlFUubqMOxrwqEF4IvhUqdEbAewtjU2 hmgYRz7mBjWFkYv8u5pgYNgKKeKjp20lXaLWSANczwQIBm1Jd9gz1VMXm+qkI8g8TrE/ b6NQ9SdKzkTxyeP2CTAGXmmrIYNvf8ZoBWwDu4tCOAVFAjxklWWV0f7yczgC6wYDQlXe 5zFsck/yO00iZ9OmS8qc5EVmARrLueJhrDbhfavWfOWpDFosKUfKmfpGCYWk1GuuUDXw pUSwn3Dx6xswauv+xVKCPWrNTeOByRff+WOdGNG3Cwo5eDDx38/lWDZg1Xmb1V4dOr2S yqVg==
Interesting observation, Colin. For me, my best frequencies are between
594 and 1134. That includes TA activity, as well. Higher doesn't seem to
do as well, with the most obvious being 1386 from Lithuania in our local
evenings. I barely ever hear anything while you fellas in Oak Bay/Gordon
Head are hearing them well. Not sure why, besides my antenna
size/locations? 73, Walt
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:05 PM R. Colin Newell <coffeecanuck@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Todays showcase of all things Trans-Pacific radio signals felt that they
> took a 3 db drop over yesterday - that said, I was at the dial a whopping
> 20 minutes later than yesterday and that
> could have accounted for the fade interval.
>
> That said, there were good signals on primaries and secondaries from 567
> khz up through my mid-band check.
> As I passed 972 Khz, I noticed that Korea was swamping the domestics on 970
> Khz -- and that is always a good sign.
> My mid-band from 909 through 1215 Khz seemed to be holding up the best as
> the local sunrise approached.
>
> For whatever reason, I get the best bang for the buck mid-band - which is
> to say, whatever Nick Hall-Patches reference antennas and receivers
> are getting, mid-band seems a bit perkier for me at my location.
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 8:28 AM Gary DeBock <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > True to the reports from Victoria yesterday, the Asians put on quite
> > a powerful show again this morning. It wasn't quite up to Hawaiian
> > standards or even the wacky conditions of late October, but it was still
> > pretty entertaining.
> >
> > The big stars in the rainy Peach Park here in Puyallup were 756-CNR1
> > (with huge S9 signals in and out from 1430-1515), 738-BEL2 with an
> English
> > program at 1534, and 864-HLKR with an S9+ signal at 1408. The regulars
> > 603-HLSA and 639-CNR1 also managed several S9+ peaks, and a presumed
> > 837-Harbin had music at good levels in and out. A presumed 657-Henan was
> > also (thankfully) giving Pyongyang BS some severe completion. The CRI
> > stations weren't quite up to their late October levels, though, and with
> > the exception of 603-China and a monster het from a presumed
> > 621-Heilongjiang, the other Chinese seemed slow to get untracked. 783 and
> > 936 were MIA, and the upper band didn't seem to share in the good
> > conditions. More details to follow...
> >
> >
> > Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> >
> >
> >
> --
> Colin Newell - Editor and creator *of *Coffeecrew.com
> <http://www.Coffeecrew.com> and DXer.ca <http://www.DXer.ca> -
> VA7WWV | Twitter @CoffeeCrew | Victoria - Canada
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx