[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Fwd: Topband: At least four more years of solar minimum?
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Fwd: Topband: At least four more years of solar minimum?
- From: Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 12:16:14 -0600
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=pFZtCwEHz1vdoA3Apns3dvLW67gLzohx98wjKxzi7Nc=; b=pUqQ3AxlZRvWudFR9uO/g4jrjNMUYnZDOy1dZn8pwmXYVkl2S8iG8J2xRSb1XgmFd9 iiJVqFBK5QqXJz5TBGudFEdKLwbvwM+wmhSd95LqEyZmePLvQsqMSPrH0DdJsVps6NP3 xbvPd45VaRzxprBssafTEcC6D3Y3rU7XqML/DhXiJp4ivIjmOzlqEdxe7bJmOjfmEIH/ oisXoAoLNPbISlrNX3Vgl26wTvvKA/PdI0+zy17IVd99Fn1ougRuAaQHscgucPAy/s7t FUhUmYh6mY2ELvDLqM0nvPLxsb4d9uVVsJo1OCmUkpjohUr8ZclwpvrOOQR2q41KU2lD 6n/A==
Lets hope this happens as we may end up with the best northern cx of our
lifetimes. 73 KAZ
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 11:57 AM Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Up until now the longest cycles have been between 12 and 13 years I
> believe (a >13 year one was recorded in the 18th century, but there's
> been some discussion as to whether that was two short cycles). The
> prediction, if true, would be longer than that. Interesting times,
> maybe.
>
> best wishes,
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> At 14:00 2018-12-08, Russ Edmunds wrote:
> >The key thing to remember here is that these are predictions, and
> >that predictions - for space weather or terrestrial weather - are
> >mostly educated guesses using computer programs, and that the
> >farther out the forecast is extended, the less accurate it will be.
> >
> >
> >That said, it is certainly not unprecedented - even in relatively
> >recent history - for a sunspot cycle to extend longer than normal,
> >and based on what's happened even over the past few months would
> >suggest that this will happen again.
> >
> >
> >But I'm not yet ready to jump on the train for 4 more years ( where
> >have I heard that expressions before ? ).
> >
> >
> >Russ Edmunds
> >
> >WB2BJH
> >
> >Blue Bell, PA
> >
> >Grid FN20id
> >
> >________________________________
> >From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Nick
> >Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2018 1:25:36 AM
> >To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
> >Subject: [IRCA] Fwd: Topband: At least four more years of solar minimum?
> >
> >from the topband list:
> >
> > >NOAA updated its predictions for smoothed sunspot numbers and solar
> > >flux through the end of 2022. As of last month, their predictions
> > >ended in 2019.
> > >Their prediction shows a smoothed sunspot number of 10 for December
> > >2018, declining to 2 in July 2020 through January 2021, then 1
> > >during February 2021 through January 2022, and 0 after that and
> > >through at least the end of 2022.
> > >www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/solar-cycle-progression<http://www.swpc.
> > noaa.gov/products/solar-cycle-progression>
> > >I hate predictions, especially about the future...
> > >73
> > >Frank
> > >W3LPL
> >
> >
> >That is some prediction, including having the solar flux below 60,
> >which I didn't think possible.
> >
> >They are not sticking their necks out about average Ap, which is
> >still as high as it was 2011-2014, and has already delivered some
> >fairly marvellous high latitude conditions
> >
> >best wishes,
> >
> >Nick
> >
> >Nick Hall-Patch
> >Victoria, BC
> >Canada
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >IRCA mailing list
> >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> >the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >IRCA mailing list
> >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> >the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Nick Hall-Patch
> Victoria, BC
> Canada
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx