Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 10-19.. Ionoshere Goes Wild

[Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>]

Actually....639 was no better than yesterday during live listening 
1400-30UT, Gary.   The Chinese seem to favo(u)r Puyallup over 
Victoria many mornings.

This morning's interest here was more that some DU's did well, as 
usually, it's either Asians, or DU's, but the trend this season has 
been to have both.   For example, New Zealand was thundering in on 
567 for a short while, and as Walt noted, JOLK and 4QR were trading 
places on 612, and something similar was happening on 891.   As to 
the Chinese, they're there, but so far, not nearly as good as 6 October.

best wishes,

Nick


At 15:44 2018-10-19, Gary DeBock wrote:
> Like Walt, I was pretty much stunned at the Asian signal levels this 
> morning after 1400. 603-HLSA, 657-Pyongyang and 738-BEL2 were all 
> hitting S9+ levels in and out (despite Mainland Chinese 
> co-channels), and 639-CNR1 wasn't too far behind. 756, 936, 963 and 
> 1035 were all in audio, and even a 5" Frequent Flyer FSL had 603, 
> 657 and 738 at S9 levels in the local park. Another 5" FSL had 
> 657-Pyongyang for extended S9 periods in the back yard at home. Totally wacky!
>
>
> 639-CNRI  Synchros   Nick shouldn't have any trouble hearing it this 
> morning :-)  https://dreamcrafts.box.com/s/iv415iap8gkk4m0jttlwivgnmwlzg1oc
>
> Full details to follow!
>
>
> Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx