I dont agree with it being wizzed away on that either. But there's
alot
more reliable technology then HF for this kinda stuff
Says a guy who lived in Alaska where HF was weak at best some days but
satelitte stuff worked FINE
Face it, the only folks I've seen complaining about WWV WWVH possibly
going
away is a bunch of DX'ers and ham radio guys. THe general public
doesn't
give a rats ass and doesn't need or use the service for the most part.
Why spent millions every year for a few thousand commercials users..
when
again, satelitte stuff is much better?
Paul
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 2:47 PM Volodya S <canswl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just think of what all of Trumps weekend golf trips to Key Largo costs
you,
> as an American taxpayer. Yep, continue to piss away your hard earned tax
> dollars ;-) Walt (and glad to be a Canadian)
> PS: sorry to be off topic. Won't happen again :-)
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 6:43 PM Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
> walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > So just because its a drop in the bucket of the US budget we should
just
> > piss away a couple million bucks?
> >
> > paul
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 2:41 PM DXer <hfdxmonitor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > >Chuck Hutton Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:54:45 -0700
> > >
> > > >The military and aeronautical sectors believe GOS is reliable. It
is
> > > >the primary basis of navigation systems for both.
> > >
> > >
> > > You beat me to it, however, it must be said that it can, and
sometimes
> > > is, blocked/interfered with.
> > >
> > > It was around 2012, I was flying into Seoul, Souht Korea, and the
North
> > > was jamming the GPS signal. Localized, fair enough, but it can
happen.
> > >
> > > We tend to always favor new technology, but old ones sometimes make a
> > > come back, either for simplicity, or because nobody else is using it
> > > anymore.
> > >
> > > I'm well aware that overtime you can fill a piggie bank with pennies,
> > > but what's the percentage of this expense in the grand scheme of
> things,
> > > i.e., the US budget?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Vince
> > > Ottawa, ON
> > >
> > > P.S.1. Ending Radio Canada International's shortwave service saved
> > > money, but I'm still wondering if the savings were worth it.
> > >
> > > P.S.2. I'm of the opinion that 'straight' savings are applicable to
> > > private endevours only. At a government level, other factors usually
> > > come into play.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the
> > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx