[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Tolerance.
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Tolerance.
- From: "Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:58:55 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=BZKq5CAlPAKVVSalZ1id8AMx+IPRg9Xh5xoCjeiU43RnmTsDV+Nm9762TYHj4aZX; h=Received:Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Agreed that IBOC is VERY relevent. I still have no problem with a separate
list for it since quite a few here wish to have this list more centered on
radios, antennas, and DX receptions and techniques. However, no one should
be banned unless they are very rude to others here and no one needs to quit.
The topic doesn't need to be closed unless it is going absolutely no where
and/or turned into a 100% flame war. This is not the case here, IMHO.
73 KAZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "W. Curt Deegan" <WWWR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "IRCA List" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 2:43 PM
Subject: [IRCA] Tolerance.
> Unfortunately, every time there is a discussion of IBOC, there are
> inevitably some few who begin complaining and threatening to quit.
> Another small group cluck, clucks and says the topic must be declared
> off limits, those who discuss it banned, or create a new list just for
> this topic. Both rather childish attitudes if you ask me.
>
> This latest exchange took place under two or three subject lines. It
> doesn't require any great intellect to realize if one is not interested,
> when one of those topics appears, delete it. I do it all the time when
> a thread of no interest to me gets rolling. I would never consider
> demanding the topic be banned just because I don't care about it.
>
> I think IBOC is a very relevant topic for this list. There are issues
> of DXing opportunities and impediments. There are technical issues also
> related to DXing. There are facts and figures about stations using
> IBOC, that some list members have every right to discuss. Some of the
> discussions of demographics and preference polls leave me cold, but
> those too are of interest to others and appropriate to the list as it
> serves all its members.
>
> If there is unpleasantness, that is not the fault of the topic but of
> individuals. That should be dealt with privately, not with a global
> denial of an entire subject of discussion.
>
> Everyone just needs to relax. No one needs to quit. Nothing needs to
> be banned or moved.
>
> Everyone should show some tolerance and accept that different people
> have differing interests.
>
> Curt
>
> --
>
> W. Curt Deegan
> Boca Raton, (Southeast) Florida
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx