Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 3-5 (Preliminary)

[Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>]

I suspect that 918 isn't easy for you at home Gary?  (or is 920 not 
too bad QRM?)  Usually here, 918 is a flash in the pan, but this 
morning there was a big carrier there for quite some time.  Audio 
wasn't great, but was definitely parallel to the webstream 
http://v.iqilu.com/radio/main/xinwen/ (thanks Chris Kadlec)

My first impression was yes, there was some emphasis on China, with a 
corresponding decrease in Japanese.  Full report later.

best wishes,

Nick


At 15:38 2018-03-05, Gary DeBock wrote:
> Another Chinese-dominated sunrise enhancement session hit the low 
> band this morning from 1400-1440, with 639-CNR1 managing S7 peaks in 
> and out, and both 603-China and 657-China ending up dominating the 
> Korean regulars on their frequencies by 1425 (although neither 
> reached very strong levels). Prior to this in the predawn darkness 
> at 1345 the wacky martial music of 657-Pyongyang BS hit an S9 level, 
> while 603-HLSA also had some potent peaks around the same time. More 
> details to follow.
>
>
> 657  Pyongyang BS   Pyongyang, N. Korea   Bizarre martial music at 
> thunderous level in the predawn darkness at 
> 1345  https://dreamcrafts.box.com/s/0o8qbmpd1b7skryeo5v9r6v2sr39q1bt
>
>
> 73 and Good DX,
>
> Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
>
> Stock CC Skywave SSB Ultralight + 15" FSL antenna
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx