[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Michigan DU's, Sept.20th



T storm QRN  have been a bother here in IL with the now near record warmth.
Re: 882 I get the same two carriers, but never audio past KHAC USB slop and
WLS slop. Likely AUS/NZ mix. Perhaps you can do better, being further from
both KHAC and WLS.

Re: 1098 hopefully you can get it better soon, and tell that the man is
speaking an island-type lang. I think this usually their s/off.

Re: 828  3GI gets out for 10 kW. I've had carriers for years. Sometimes
WCCO has faded down by then. Last season I managed some audio, same as
podcast. Another possibility for me is at month's end or into early Oct
where in good cx ABC stns. hang around 'til 1200 UTC and you can make out
their trumpet fanfare into ABC nx.

I wonder what 693 is? So far no audio and here it is bothered by the
tragedy of WSCR IBOC.

Re: antenna experiments. The Double Flag is a good antenna for sunrise
DXing for DU's with good low angle pickup and 7 dB more signal (given the
same footprint) than the Double KAZ. However, the DFlag seems to have in
general 5 to 10 dB worse back null and while that doesn't harm me much at
sunrise, it is quite harmful to my DX any other time. So it is back to a
DKAZ for my west antenna and once I have it working like before, I will add
a second one staggered by about 30 feet south and 80 feet east and array
them. Modelling shows this is promising. I haven't any more room to array
them directly inline.

73 KAZ Barrington IL

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Tim Tromp <kilokat7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Heavy t-storms crackling across the band this morning spoiled what could
> have otherwise been decent DU conditions (decent for Michigan).  Unattended
> SDR recordings this morning caught the following:
>
>
> 612, with threshold audio, man speaking, and music heard starting at 1128
> UTC and ending at 1131 UTC and back into person speaking.  Not really
> enough signal to understand any speech or ID the song played in between the
> talk.
>
>
> 693, a nice solid carrier at 1126 UTC and lasting for a few minutes but not
> good enough for audio.
>
>
> 738, threshold audio at 1125 UTC but buried by 740 WRPQ splatter, which was
> worse than usual here this morning.
>
>
> 828.002 UNID, 1136 UTC, man speaking, possibly an interview with another
> person (YL maybe?), unfortunately nothing intelligible due to WCPT/WBAP
> splatter and strong t-storm noise that's been plaguing me the last several
> mornings.  First time ever hearing any audio on 828, usually a just a weak
> carrier at best, even during good DU cx here.  Honestly it's a channel that
> I usually don't even consider checking, but the propagation was different
> this morning.
>
>
> 882 SAH, a couple of strong solid carriers at near equal strength beginning
> at 1123 UTC and separated by 1 Hz, but neither good enough for audio.
>
>
> 1098 presumed V7AB, faint music first noted at 1123 UTC and again with a
> peak at 1128 UTC with song ending and then man speaking, but much splatter
> from local 1090 WKBZ to contend with this morning and t-storm crackle.
>
>
> Weaker DU carriers also noted peaking between 1116-1130 UTC on 549, 558,
> 576, 585, 594, 603, 621, 693, 702, 729, 747, 756, & 1035.
>
> 73,
> Tim Tromp
> West Michigan
> Perseus SDR + southwest phased BOGs
> Local sunrise: 1131 UTC
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx