Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 3-21

[d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Hi Nick, 

<<< What, no North Korean on 657? They are rarely heard in Victoria, 
yet this morning, they were quite strong. >>> 

657-Pyongyang was checked here several times this morning, but the strong signal that you mentioned seems to have passed over Puyallup. Maybe the ionosphere finally had mercy on this valley, and decided to send the monotonous drivel elsewhere? 

Gary 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Nick Hall-Patch" <nhp@xxxxxxxx> 
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 9:08:45 AM 
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 3-21 

What, no North Korean on 657? They are rarely heard in Victoria, 
yet this morning, they were quite strong. 

best wishes, 

Nick 


At 15:12 21-03-17, d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: 
>Thanks to Richard, Steve and Bill for their detailed TP-DXing 
>reports. The Japanese on 594, 693, 747 and 774 were at similar 
>modest strength here, along with 1566-HLAZ at a brief good level 
>before the antenna switch at 1345, and a fair signal in and out from 
>1593-CNR1 just before 1400. 
> 
>But the overwhelming star of the session here seems to have passed 
>over the other DXers-- another monster signal from 972-HLCA, 
>reaching S9 peaks in and out on a single 5 inch FSL from 1320-1400. 
> 
>972 HLCA Dangjin, S. Korea Korean female conversation at a blowtorch 
>level at 1347-- in and out at this strength until the 3 + 1 pips at 1400 
>https://app.box.com/s/otxw1paf6sa51poyi95k61a91xguphlt 
> 
>73 and Good DX, 
>Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) 
>7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight + 5 inch "Frequent Flyer" 
>FSL antenna (combo photo from this morning's back yard session posted at 
>https://app.box.com/s/yjbfdrqgj737x7f1xj6zfah4f97xxyyd ) 
> 
> 
> 
>_______________________________________________ 
>IRCA mailing list 
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Nick Hall-Patch 
Victoria, BC 
Canada 

_______________________________________________ 
IRCA mailing list 
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx