[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] ABC To End Shortwave Transmissions!
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] ABC To End Shortwave Transmissions!
- From: Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 06:52:00 +0000
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DF/qd8LIDlOmLG1SROxnXx0vXcnQkG3UYU6mPWSzFKY=; b=WWr8rOCogFAYw6zON45fXZExG3sEoYcFLgoOs9/k2YiaNvN2DjcCLY4+HfiaKuT+Cr EwCDIrFbIyr+XWFSqgacndUFUX4ks/AyN0nPiNQXkpxxJJG14t3ChtmdUz7jdeT8Tgvj rSIitv2yrUNssPgLFU2uvqut5UKy9Kb14rEceao/eLLYr1MtGWo6EejbwkOrH3PaSiJ5 YXTeX0HPYcZ75C927y///SeY1gj5VsVuIaVvvtHOjBfrzi9UX1hIzqy0bqds70B1iXf2 rWXCRV0KlP9qfYRdwAOgSXA40r+AiHBUeKfeSfhRu1H8a9yCfLsFvN18b6gVkKHy/mh1 ahXA==
Paul, you clearly have not experienced a typhoon or earthquake. The
Pacific isn't called the ring of fire for nothing. When all hell breaks
loose, your satellite dish will be worthless, while a $10 SW receiver will
still work just fine, thank you. Walt
On Monday, December 5, 2016, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ABC NT is 50kw nearly 24/7 on one frequency or another. radio Australia is
> nearly 24/7 with 100kw.
>
> That amounts to a gigantic power bill for one thing and all the maintence
> staff costs
>
> To spend all that for such a small audience isn't realistic anymore. Are
> they going to lose some listeners in heir core target area? Yes, I'm sure
> they will...
>
> For a few hundred bucks, you can get a free to air satellite dish and
> reciever that will pick up ABC/Radio Austrlaia crystal clear 24/7
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:43 PM Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Please don't exaggerate, Paul. RNZI accomplishes all Pacific reception
> > with both DRM and AM with 35 or 50 kW, and not 24/7. RNZI's annual
> budget
> > is somewhere in the vicinity of $2 million NZ. Peanuts, for a national
> > broadcaster when compared to TV budgets. Big cost savings are simply an
> > easy justification to eliminate SW. A fallacious argument used time and
> > time again by numerous international broadcasters in the past. Walt
> >
> > On Monday, December 5, 2016, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
> > walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > If ABC NT and Radio Australia SW had a sizeable audience, they wouldn't
> > be
> > > disappearing.
> > >
> > > It doesn't have to be expensive? Do you have any clue what a 50,000 or
> > > 100,000 watt SW transmitter costs to run 24/7/365?
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:28 PM Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Paul, I don't think you understand the influence of Australia in the
> > > > Pacific. They ARE the regional power. The island nations look to
> the
> > > > Aussies for foreign policy, security and economic cooperation and
> > > > assistance. RA was not broadcasting to a few DXers and Aussies, as
> you
> > > > state. That's being very condescending. RA (and RNZI) provides a
> > > lifeline
> > > > during typhoons, earthquakes and tsunamis, and regional emergencies,
> > > > including political upheavals. Please tell me how local FM
> > transmission
> > > or
> > > > on-line transmission can replace SW broadcasting. A few years ago,
> > Fiji
> > > > had a military coup. Foreign rebroadcasts disappeared from local
> > > > stations. Hence the value of a robust SW service. It does not have
> to
> > > be
> > > > expensive. Walt
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, December 5, 2016, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
> > > > walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > And financially, out of country coverage to cover a few ex Aussies
> > and
> > > > > dxers makes absolutely zero sense
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:25 PM DXer <hfdxmonitor@xxxxxxxxx
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > For in-country coverage the proposed change kind of makes sense,
> > but
> > > > for
> > > > > > out-of-country coverage it's just nonsense.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > They are not the first, and likely won't be the last, to believe
> in
> > > > > > reliable local partnership and distribution.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Local governments will always step in, and block their local
> > > > > > arrangements, when they feel like it. The only way around it is
> to
> > > > > > pander to the government. In this case they won't do any good to
> > the
> > > > > > people they claim to be serving.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Vince
> > > > > > Ottawa, ON
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2016-12-05 7:55 PM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. wrote:
> > > > > > > And it appears to be for real this time. I can't say I blame
> > > them...
> > > > > > > continue with somewhat inferior "AM" Signals or build out more
> FM
> > > > > > > transmitters?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ABC Exits Shortwave Radio Transmission
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > IRCA mailing list
> > > > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> > > > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of
> > the
> > > > > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > IRCA mailing list
> > > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > > > >
> > > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of
> the
> > > > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> > the
> > > > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > > > >
> > > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > > > >
> > > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > IRCA mailing list
> > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > > >
> > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> the
> > > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > > >
> > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > > >
> > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx