Re: [IRCA] ABC To End Shortwave Transmissions!

[Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>]

Please don't exaggerate, Paul.  RNZI accomplishes all Pacific reception
with both DRM and AM with 35 or 50 kW, and not 24/7.  RNZI's annual budget
is somewhere in the vicinity of $2 million NZ.  Peanuts, for a national
broadcaster when compared to TV budgets.  Big cost savings are simply an
easy justification to eliminate SW.  A fallacious argument used time and
time again by numerous international broadcasters in the past.  Walt

On Monday, December 5, 2016, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If ABC NT and Radio Australia SW had a sizeable audience, they wouldn't be
> disappearing.
>
> It doesn't have to be expensive? Do you have any clue what a 50,000 or
> 100,000 watt SW transmitter costs to run 24/7/365?
>
> Paul
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:28 PM Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Paul, I don't think you understand the influence of Australia in the
> > Pacific.  They ARE the regional power.  The island nations look to the
> > Aussies for foreign policy, security and economic cooperation and
> > assistance.  RA was not broadcasting to a few DXers and Aussies, as you
> > state. That's being very condescending.  RA (and RNZI) provides a
> lifeline
> > during typhoons, earthquakes and tsunamis, and regional emergencies,
> > including political upheavals.  Please tell me how local FM transmission
> or
> > on-line transmission can replace SW broadcasting.  A few years ago, Fiji
> > had a military coup.  Foreign rebroadcasts disappeared from local
> > stations.  Hence the value of a robust SW service.  It does not have to
> be
> > expensive.   Walt
> >
> > On Monday, December 5, 2016, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
> > walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > And financially, out of country coverage to cover a few ex Aussies and
> > > dxers makes absolutely zero sense
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:25 PM DXer <hfdxmonitor@xxxxxxxxx
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > For in-country coverage the proposed change kind of makes sense, but
> > for
> > > > out-of-country coverage it's just nonsense.
> > > >
> > > > They are not the first, and likely won't be the last, to believe in
> > > > reliable local partnership and distribution.
> > > >
> > > > Local governments will always step in, and block their local
> > > > arrangements, when they feel like it. The only way around it is to
> > > > pander to the government. In this case they won't do any good to the
> > > > people they claim to be serving.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Vince
> > > > Ottawa, ON
> > > >
> > > > On 2016-12-05 7:55 PM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. wrote:
> > > > > And it appears to be for real this time. I can't say I blame
> them...
> > > > > continue with somewhat inferior "AM" Signals or build out more FM
> > > > > transmitters?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ABC Exits Shortwave Radio Transmission
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > IRCA mailing list
> > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > > >
> > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> the
> > > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > > >
> > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > > >
> > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx