And if anyone besides you guys can pull it off, it'd be me lol.
O am considering an interesting antenna location later this winter for
shites and giggles.. the yukon River is about 100 yards wide from river
bank to river bank. I am considering for the heck of it, run a wire across
from one end of the bank to the other. would make a goo photo op, if
nothing else when the river is frozen up.
Paul
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Walt has heard it on 693 in Haida Gwaii, and that was also heard at
> Grayland in October 2009. Sometimes a megawatt of transmitter power pays
> off.
>
> Glad you like a challenge. Good luck.
>
> Nick
>
>
> At 14:27 18-11-16, Paul B. Walker, Jr. wrote:
>
>> What frequencies should I look for Bangladesh on?
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > 1242 is a "second tier" station here Paul. It starts to deliver audio
>> > when high latitude conditions improve. In the last couple of weeks
>> even
>> > the "first tier" stations such as JOUB-774 have been mostly missing in
>> > action here, likely due to continuing geomagnetic activity which doesn't
>> > seem to be affecting your paths from Japan and Korea. Those paths are
>> on a
>> > more southerly path from you than they are from here.
>> >
>> > When you start hearing Bangladesh from there, I'll bet conditions down
>> > here will be pretty exceptional also, hi.
>> >
>> > best wishes,
>> >
>> > Nick
>> >
>> >
>> > At 06:04 18-11-16, Paul B. Walker, Jr. wrote:
>> >
>> >> It's interesting, what I'm assuming, solely being closer, does... 1242,
>> >> which is just a het or "imaginary" audio for you is one of my
>> strongest as
>> >> of late here.
>> >>
>> >> Paul
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Not a loud morning, but there was some interest. My recording was
>> on
>> >> the
>> >> > North Flag this morning, so missed out on 738, 1098 etc., but still
>> got
>> >> > some 1116.
>> >> >
>> >> > Low band Asians were primarily from sunset enhancement at the
>> >> transmitter.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native
>> speaker, at
>> >> > least briefly):
>> >> >
>> >> > not quite
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Reasonable audio at times during the period (much of it
>> understandable
>> >> > by a native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):
>> >> >
>> >> > 1566 HLAZ first signs of this were a bit of mumbling around 1450UT,
>> but
>> >> > didn't really develop until 1510UT, getting to this level by 1523UT,
>> >> with a
>> >> > female ballad. Stayed more or less at similar level for about 5
>> more
>> >> > minutes, including some Chinese talk by a woman
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or
>> noise
>> >> > could be understood by a native speaker:
>> >> >
>> >> > 747 JOIB woman in Japanese 0758UT, fading to weak pips on hour
>> >> > 774 JOUB pips at 0800UT, and a minute or so of Japanese talk by man
>> >> before
>> >> > fading out
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be
>> guessed
>> >> at
>> >> > by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or
>> music)
>> >> >
>> >> > 594 woman and man talking, Japanese perhaps, 0800UT, but did not hear
>> >> pips
>> >> > on the hour. A reprise with a man talking at 1523UT, too rough to
>> >> really
>> >> > tell language, but could be Japanese.
>> >> > 1116 brief music 1509-10UT, plus some mumbling.
>> >> > 1593 CNR1 woman and man talking //6125 1521UT
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Strongish het, no or "near imaginary" audio (either undermodulated or
>> >> > ravaged by splatter) lots of near audio here
>> >> >
>> >> > 621 702 738 756 882 891 1098 1179 1242 1386 1422 1503
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > best wishes,
>> >> >
>> >> > Nick
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > IRCA mailing list
>> >> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> >> >
>> >> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> >> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
>> the
>> >> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> >> >
>> >> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> >> >
>> >> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> IRCA mailing list
>> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> >>
>> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> >>
>> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> >>
>> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>
>> >
>> > Nick Hall-Patch
>> > Victoria, BC
>> > Canada
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IRCA mailing list
>> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> >
>> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> >
>> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> >
>> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
> Nick Hall-Patch
> Victoria, BC
> Canada
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx