Re: [IRCA] TP 17 Nov Victoria version

[Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>]

693 is the frequency to watch.  Conditions for you to hear them have to be
very disturbed.  1566 would yield India under the same conditions.   73,
 Walt

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What frequencies should I look for Bangladesh on?
>
> Paul
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > 1242 is a "second tier" station here Paul.   It starts to deliver audio
> > when high latitude conditions improve.   In the last couple of weeks even
> > the "first tier" stations such as JOUB-774 have been mostly missing in
> > action here, likely due to continuing geomagnetic activity which doesn't
> > seem to be affecting your paths from Japan and Korea.  Those paths are
> on a
> > more southerly path from you than they are from here.
> >
> > When you start hearing Bangladesh from there, I'll bet conditions down
> > here will be pretty exceptional also, hi.
> >
> > best wishes,
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> > At 06:04 18-11-16, Paul B. Walker, Jr. wrote:
> >
> >> It's interesting, what I'm assuming, solely being closer, does... 1242,
> >> which is just a het or "imaginary" audio for you is one of my strongest
> as
> >> of late here.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Not a loud morning, but there was some interest.   My recording was on
> >> the
> >> > North Flag this morning, so missed out on 738, 1098 etc., but still
> got
> >> > some 1116.
> >> >
> >> > Low band Asians were primarily from sunset enhancement at the
> >> transmitter.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker,
> at
> >> > least briefly):
> >> >
> >> > not quite
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Reasonable audio  at  times during the period (much of it
> understandable
> >> > by a native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):
> >> >
> >> > 1566 HLAZ first signs of this were a bit of mumbling around 1450UT,
> but
> >> > didn't really develop until 1510UT, getting to this level by 1523UT,
> >> with a
> >> > female ballad.   Stayed more or less at similar level for about 5 more
> >> > minutes, including some Chinese talk by a woman
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or
> noise
> >> > could be understood by a native speaker:
> >> >
> >> > 747 JOIB woman in Japanese 0758UT, fading to weak pips on hour
> >> > 774 JOUB pips at 0800UT, and a minute or so of Japanese talk by man
> >> before
> >> > fading out
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed
> >> at
> >> > by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or
> music)
> >> >
> >> > 594 woman and man talking, Japanese perhaps, 0800UT, but did not hear
> >> pips
> >> > on the hour.  A  reprise with a man talking at 1523UT, too rough to
> >> really
> >> > tell language, but could be Japanese.
> >> > 1116 brief music 1509-10UT, plus some mumbling.
> >> > 1593 CNR1 woman and man talking //6125 1521UT
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Strongish het, no or "near imaginary" audio (either undermodulated or
> >> > ravaged by splatter) lots of near audio here
> >> >
> >> > 621 702 738 756  882 891  1098 1179 1242 1386  1422 1503
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > best wishes,
> >> >
> >> > Nick
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > IRCA mailing list
> >> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >> >
> >> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> the
> >> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >> >
> >> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >> >
> >> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >
> > Nick Hall-Patch
> > Victoria, BC
> > Canada
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx