Re: [IRCA] TP 17 Nov Victoria version

["Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>]

It's interesting, what I'm assuming, solely being closer, does... 1242,
which is just a het or "imaginary" audio for you is one of my strongest as
of late here.

Paul

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Not a loud morning, but there was some interest.   My recording was on the
> North Flag this morning, so missed out on 738, 1098 etc., but still got
> some 1116.
>
> Low band Asians were primarily from sunset enhancement at the transmitter.
>
>
>
> pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, at
> least briefly):
>
> not quite
>
>
>
> Reasonable audio  at  times during the period (much of it understandable
> by a native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):
>
> 1566 HLAZ first signs of this were a bit of mumbling around 1450UT, but
> didn't really develop until 1510UT, getting to this level by 1523UT, with a
> female ballad.   Stayed more or less at similar level for about 5 more
> minutes, including some Chinese talk by a woman
>
>
>
>
> not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or noise
> could be understood by a native speaker:
>
> 747 JOIB woman in Japanese 0758UT, fading to weak pips on hour
> 774 JOUB pips at 0800UT, and a minute or so of Japanese talk by man before
> fading out
>
>
>
>
>
> Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at
> by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music)
>
> 594 woman and man talking, Japanese perhaps, 0800UT, but did not hear pips
> on the hour.  A  reprise with a man talking at 1523UT, too rough to really
> tell language, but could be Japanese.
> 1116 brief music 1509-10UT, plus some mumbling.
> 1593 CNR1 woman and man talking //6125 1521UT
>
>
> Strongish het, no or "near imaginary" audio (either undermodulated or
> ravaged by splatter) lots of near audio here
>
> 621 702 738 756  882 891  1098 1179 1242 1386  1422 1503
>
>
>
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx