Hi Nick,
The conclusions were inconclusive, LOL!
The bulk of the so-called experiments involved observing phasing results
with close spacing (approx. 70 feet between antennas). Andrew Ikin of
Wellbrook has said repeatedly to me and Dave that his phaser design
requires a minimum of 40 meters spacing to work effectively. However, Dave
had the Quantum Phaser along, and he knew we could get *some* results at
closer spacing but with a limited bandwidth. We did not have a Wellbrook
phasing unit with us this trip.
Dave found that he could indeed get decent nulls (loop vs loop, or loop vs
vertical) at 70 feet, but unfortunately the desired DX signal strength
dropped along with the nulled station! That's the main takeaway that I
remember from our work, which granted wasn't very scientific. Too bad you
weren't along, Nick, as I know you'd keep us in line and help us reduce
variables and banish wishful thinking :^)
73,
Guy
---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nicholas Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc:
> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 12:44:49 +0000
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Cape Lookout Oregon non-DX Overview - Oct. 31-Nov. 2
> And what did you conclude from the experiments, Guy? I always find that
> my experiments raise more questions than they answer, especially if they
> involve phasing.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx