Re: [IRCA] SE FL IBOC Status
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] SE FL IBOC Status



Our tests are consistent with those of Tom Ray in NYC and others... in high
noise environments, the HD signal will be usable to or beyond the listenable
contour of the analog signal. I'd love to know what you find on your end,
whether it is a receiver issue or one at the transmission side. Are there
other HD stations in the market, ones that you can compare with? 

David. 


-----Original Message-----
From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Craig Healy
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 6:39 AM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] SE FL IBOC Status

>   Of course it's the radio's fault! Second set produces identical dreary
> dissonant results, consistent with a this contrivance of avaricious
dullards?
> Simply blame that radio as well. And the third. And the fourth....u.s.w.

To be honest, if David had better results at KTNQ, then it's logical to
suggest the radio I have might be bad.  I have been amazed at the poor
coverage of HD with the JVC.  I will be meeting with the WHJJ engineer
sometime soon to try to compare notes, and to see who else in his
organization has an IBOC radio.  I'll also call the WBSM engineer who has a
Panasonic.  I want to get his thoughts on this.  Neither are DXers, BTW.

Craig Healy
Providence, RI


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx