|
A reply was received from Eric - see below. My comments
Eric:
(1) I have never supported either IBOC or BPL. Why would you say
that?
(2) You've merely repeated your claim for the nth time when you say AM is
subject to the same interference. I'm awaiting some real information.
(3) I've followed the ARRL web site since the beginning. There's nothing
there that says BPL is a problem for MW as best I know. If you know
of some specific data there that says BPL is a MW problem, please let us
know instead of just giving a link to a web site which has tons of information.
A pointer to arrl.org really doesn't provide any information to us.
Chuck
______________________________________________________________________
Chuck,
You should not be supporting destructive technologies like BPL and
IBOC-DAB. What I am saying is that the same things that interfere with HF
broadcasting also interferes with MW broadcasting. AM broadcasts will be subject
to the same interference as HF broadcasts from BPL service.
Please refer to the ARRL Web site; they have testing information on BPL. Go
to http://www.arrl.org/ What the
FCC did was ignore the people.
Eric
|
_______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx