Re: [HCDX] USSR in 1920s and 1930s did not jam -- USA politically isapproaching USSR after WWII, jamming is not geopolitiacally impossible...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HCDX] USSR in 1920s and 1930s did not jam -- USA politically isapproaching USSR after WWII, jamming is not geopolitiacally impossible...
----- Original Message -----
From: "mhev" <mhev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [HCDX] USSR in 1920s and 1930s did not jam -- USA politically isapproaching USSR after WWII, jamming is not geopolitiacally impossible...
>USSR in 1920s and 1930s did not jam; yet the USSR became the most
>significant jammer for nearly 50 years.
The tsar didn't jam during the 1880s either. During both periods, there was no significant amount of international broadcasting to the Russian Federation.
>The USA politically is approaching USSR after WWII, so jamming is not
>geopolitiacally impossible...
Not quite yet; Novaya Stalin-ochka isn't going to make her run for the presidency until 2004. And exactly what is it that the US would jam now?
>I am not against jamming, per se -- but its usefulness is made possible by a
>very narrow set of conditions.
Indeed. We wouldn't want the peasants and workers hearing things that aren't useful, would we?
dc
---[Start Commercial]---------------------
World Radio TV Handbook 2003 is out! Order it now!
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0823059677/hardcoredxcom
---[End Commercial]-----------------------
________________________________________
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
_______________________________________________
THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at http://dsl.org/copyleft/dsl.txt