[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] An Unhappy Birthday For WLW-AM



--- Begin Message ---
Hi All:
While I'm sorry to see the big stations go, they really are dinosaurs. The only way I can get a listenable signal out of WLW anymore is to listen in the car, and even then they will occasionally be overridden by a descending warbling tone that has to be coming from one of the neighbors' routers (if it's not coming from mine). If there was something I wanted to listen to on WLW I'd probably listen online. I personally don't think AM can be revitalized, no matter how many signals they put on it. The costs are getting too high to justify the return on investment, particularly when we start talking about highly directional stations. How many stations have cut their night power so they can be non-directional? My guess is, several hundred

73David
 

    On Thursday, March 3, 2016 7:50 PM, Patrick Martin <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 

 Although I think this is a shame. However, this has been going on since the 1970s where more and more stations are allowed on clear channel frequencies and the long distance reception is getting harder and harder. This is no surprise. The FCC is changing the whole spectrum. They are repacking the TV dial and selling frequencies to the cel phone industry, so TV markets will be forced to cram more channels into a smaller area. It used to be back in the 60s, a person could easily listen to stations coast to coast with a clock radio. Today, hearing a station a 1000 miles away takes some effort. But we do have streaming in today's World and I use that a lot with my wifi radio. 

Patrick

Patrick Martin
Seaside OR
KGED QSL Manager

> From: wb6tnb@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:03:39 -0800
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [IRCA] An Unhappy Birthday For WLW-AM
> 
> http://wvxu.org/post/unhappy-birthday-wlw-am
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
 ÂÂÂ ÂÂÂ ÂÂÂ Â ÂÂÂ ÂÂÂ Â 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



  

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx