Re: [IRCA] 1566-China (Yanbian Jammer) Information

[d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx]

<<<ÂÂ AsiaWaves is your friend. Alan lists 1566 Yanbian PBS as: 
>Jamming transmitter against South Korean station (FEBC).//1053 kHz. 
>so naturally it would be parallel to Yanbian PBS 1053. 
>I take it that in this case "jamming" means "powerful interfering 
>broadcast" rather than "noise transmission". 
>ChuckÂÂ >>> 
 
PossiblyÂ1053-Yanbian PBS was the Chinese station mixing with the Korean Jammer at a good level during the Cape Perpetua DXpedition in August last year. Maybe a breakthrough case of a Jammer jamming the Jammer? 
 
https://app.box.com/s/nvld5g2vhup50hdau3u01wfl0qycdono 
 
Gary 
 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Nick Hall-Patch" <nhp@xxxxxxxx> 
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 7:32:52 AM 
Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1566-China (Yanbian Jammer) Information 

Indeed it does Chuck. 

As you Âwere replying Âto Gary's e-mail that contained the sentence 

>It does not use a noise jammer like the 1053 station in Korea. 

I jumped to the conclusion that is what you had been referring 
to. Â If I didn't jump to conclusions, I'd hardly get any exercise at 
all, so you'll have to bear with me, I'm afraid. 

Nick 




At 07:08 02-12-15, you wrote: 
>Nick: 
>AsiaWaves is your friend. Alan lists 1566 Yanbian PBS as: 
>Jamming transmitter against South Korean station (FEBC).//1053 kHz. 
>so naturally it would be parallel to Yanbian PBS 1053. 
>I take it that in this case "jamming" means "powerful interfering 
>broadcast" rather than "noise transmission". 
>Chuck 
> > Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:31:56 +0000 
> > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > From: nhp@xxxxxxxx 
> > Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1566-China (Yanbian Jammer) Information 
> > 
> > I wonder which station on 1053 would be parallel Chuck? Â It seems a 
> > little odd that China would rebroadcast what is supposed to be a 
> > jammer in South Korea. 
> > 
> > 
> > Nick 
> > 
> > 
> > At 17:31 01-12-15, you wrote: 
> > >Hmmm. Alan Davies says on asiawaves.net that it is indeed 
> parallel to 1053. 
> > >Chuck 
> > > 
> > > > Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:48:09 +0000 
> > > > From: d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1566-China (Yanbian Jammer) Information 
> > > > 
> > > > Mauno, 
> > > > 
> > > > The Yanbian-1566 Chinese station has always used the PBS 
> > > programming in an obvious attempt to block the reception of HLAZ in 
> > > China, a practice which Bill W. says is also frequently done by 
> > > China in attempts to block VOA and other stations it doesn't want 
> > > its people to receive. It does not use a noise jammer like the 1053 
> > > station in Korea. 
> > > > 
> > > > Gary 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > 
> > > > From: "Mauno Ritola" <Mauno.Ritola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> > > > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 12:05:19 AM 
> > > > Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1566-China (Yanbian Jammer) Information 
> > > > 
> > > > Are we talking now about noise jamming or Yanbian PBS programming? 
> > > > 
> > > > Mauno 
> > > > 
> > > > 1.12.2015, 9:16, d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx kirjoitti: 
> > > > > Hi Walt and Nick, 
> > > > > 
> > > > > <<< Â There was certainly a Chinese broadcaster heard on 1566 a 
> > > week ago on 
> > > > > Gabriola Island, quite readable in HLAZ fades. Â Haven't noted it at 
> > > > > home yet however. Â >>> 
> > > > > 
> > > > > It hasn't shown up for me at home either, Nick, but it was 
> > > pretty obvious during a trip to Ocean Shores, WA last April (in 
> > > female Chinese, under HLAZ's male Japanese). By coincidence, this 
> > > was apparently the first week that the 1566 Chinese HLAZ Jammer 
> > > started to broadcast, according to Hiroyuki Okamura of Yokosuka, Japan. 
> > > > > 
> > > 
> http://www.mediafire.com/listen/8bdpotl5ib1b3px/1566-HLAZ-UnID-mix-1314z040915CCSW.MP3 
> 
> > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 73, Gary 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > > 
> > > > > From: "Nick Hall-Patch" <nhp@xxxxxxxx> 
> > > > > To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" 
> > > <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 10:21:13 PM 
> > > > > Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1566-China (Yanbian Jammer) Information 
> > > > > 
> > > > > There was certainly a Chinese broadcaster heard on 1566 a week ago on 
> > > > > Gabriola Island, quite readable in HLAZ fades. Â Haven't noted it at 
> > > > > home yet however. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > best wishes, 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Nick 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > At 05:39 01-12-15, Walt wrote: 
> > > > >> Thanks for that information. Â I was wondering about the jammer 
> > > > >> while in Masset in October. ÂI did not hear it, and was expecting to 
> > > > >> hear it, so I guess it was likely off the air during my visit (in 
> > > > >> mid-October). 73,...Walt 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:15 AM, <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> > > > >> wrote: > Â ÂFor those interested, here is some further information 
> > > > >> about the Â1566-Chinese Jammer from Chris Kadlec, who is currently 
> > > > >> in Seoul, S. Korea. > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________ 
> > > > > IRCA mailing list 
> > > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those 
> > > of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the 
> > > opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> > > > > 
> > > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> > > > > 
> > > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________ 
> > > > > IRCA mailing list 
> > > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those 
> > > of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the 
> > > opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> > > > > 
> > > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> > > > > 
> > > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________ 
> > > > IRCA mailing list 
> > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> > > > 
> > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of 
> > > the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the 
> > > opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> > > > 
> > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> > > > 
> > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________ 
> > > > IRCA mailing list 
> > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> > > > 
> > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of 
> > > the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the 
> > > opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> > > > 
> > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> > > > 
> > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > >_______________________________________________ 
> > >IRCA mailing list 
> > >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> > > 
> > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> > >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
> > >the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> > > 
> > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> > > 
> > >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > IRCA mailing list 
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> > 
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of 
> the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the 
> opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> > 
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> > 
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > 
> 
>_______________________________________________ 
>IRCA mailing list 
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


_______________________________________________ 
IRCA mailing list 
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx