[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Beverage versus DKAZ (was: TP for 20 October from Masset)



Actually a Bev has best gain straight up from directions perpendicular (+/- 90 deg) to the main beam. 

I'd not expect that a good comparison could be made comparing an antenna at 300 deg vs one at 220 deg. That being said, a 700 ft BOG is a very good antenna and I'd expect its more narrow beam to outperform a single DKAZ for it's intended direction.

Walt do you have room to array two DKAZ? ie consider 100 meters spacing side by side aimed 220 for a more narrow beam and to better reduce stateside and Asian QRM on DU channels.

73 KAZ

-----Original Message-----
>From: Chuck Hutton <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
>Sent: Oct 21, 2015 11:35 AM
>To: "irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] Beverage versus DKAZ (was: TP for 20 October from Masset)
>
>I think Mark has it 100% right. The Beverage actually has best gain straight up while the DKAZ is down maybe 7-10 dB at overhead angles.
>Chuck 
>
>To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>From: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>CC: markwa1ion@xxxxxxx
>Subject: [IRCA] Beverage versus DKAZ (was: TP for 20 October from Masset)
>Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:04:20 +0000
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
>
>
>--Forwarded Message Attachment--
>Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:04:16 -0400
>From: markwa1ion@xxxxxxx
>To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Beverage versus DKAZ (was: TP for 20 October from Masset)
>
> 
>Could the anomalous results be from the fact that sometimes at the sunrise or sunset transition you actually have higher angle pick-up for long haul because of a tilted ionospheric layer above the receiving site (enabling chordal / ducted mode propagation reducing the number of ground reflections)?
> 
> 
>http://www.radtelnetwork.com.au/propagation/HFpropagation_files/img013.gif
> 
> 
>An antenna that is efficient for high angles may briefly outperform otherwise superior long haul DX (i.e. low angle pick-up) antennas.
> 
> 
>There used to be a station near Madrid, Spain on 1359 kHz that ran big power into a Near Vertical Incidence Skywave antenna (horizontal dipole?) to push out high angle skip to penetrate isolated valley areas between mountains.  Here in Massachusetts during mid-evening the station was no stronger than other high band Spain stations in the 5 to 10 kW class.  But as dawn reached Madrid, the signal came up and got crazy-loud, often the strongest station from across the "pond" at the time.
> 
> 
>160-m hams have reported that they have brief periods when a low dipole or horizontal loop below quarter-wave height ("cloud burner") contacts DX that their big verticals or high-altitude beams or dipoles miss.  95% of the time it's the other way around of course.
> 
> 
>Mark Connelly, WA1ION
>South Yarmouth, MA
> 
> 
><<
>From: Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
>700'
> 
> 
>On Tuesday, 20 October 2015, Chuck Hutton
><charlesh3@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Like Neil, I am curious about the length of the
>BOG.And when you say you
>> noted the same with the Wellbrook, do you mean it
>lost out to a BOG or to a
>> DKAZ?
>> Chuck
>>
>> > Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015
>01:16:18 +0000
>> > From: canswl@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
>> > To:
>neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>; irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <javascript:;>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP for 20 October from Masset
>> >
>> > Point is taken,
>Neil. The Bog is about 300 deg while the DKAZ is aimed
>> > about 220 deg. So
>not exactly a perfect A B comparison.  I noted the same
>> > years back using
>the twin Wellbrook arrays.  Walt
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, 20 October 2015, neilkaz
><neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Walt " DKAZ worked
>very well before LSR but really dies off after
>> leaving
>> > > the
>> > > 
>Bog"
>> > >
>> > > A big difference would surprise me since DKAZ is also good
>for low
>> arrival
>> > > angles. What exact direction is the BOG and how
>long?
>> > > What exact direction is the DKAZ?
>> > >
>> > > 73 and thx ..
>KAZ
>>>
> 		 	   		  
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx