Re: [IRCA] 1130 Interference
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] 1130 Interference



Deane ran the numbers (and gave me the formula for figuring ERP on my
own) for KPWX.  Their day 25Kw pattern has an ERP of 51 Kw at 0 degrees,
which is fairly close to being aimed right at CKWX.  So wonder if maybe
an engineer told the station management that 50Kw of signal (ERP) is
headed our way instead of saying 25 Kw and then having to explain ERP.
Good thing Vancouver is not on a 45 degree heading - the ERP that way is
81 Kw.  Also the short towers have been mentioned which puts the first
hop close-in, like maybe Vancouver. :)

102Kw ERP (toward Vancouver) if they get the 50 Kw app approved. :O

73,
Dave in Indy

PS: Love the "50,000 Kw" number.  Bet they could hear that 24/7 - us
too. :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:27:53 -0500
From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
	<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Re; 1130 Interference
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTimrj4waeY2rieFfpCDYABMqSmwTxmaAkAeO-1Qw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I actually thought about that..lol.

They're probably asusming that the 50KW CP will be granted and using
that to
help their case.. since to listeners, 50KW is alot more then 25KW in
their
mind. although the actual difference between 25KW and 50KW aren't much
at
all.



On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Pete Taylor <ptdx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Paul B. Walker, Jr. wrote:
>
> > How can KPWX run 50KW when the Permit to do so hasn't even been
granted
> yet?
> > (It hadn't been when I checked Friday morning)
> >
> You should therefore write CKWX and tell them that since they are
stating
> that the station is running 50,000 (sic) kilowatts.
>
> Pete Taylor
> Tacoma, WA
> 12225w 4719n
> HQ180 & ICF2010
> Kiwa aircore & Palomar loops
> DX398, SRF-59 & M37V
> Eton E100 + Tecsun PL-300/380

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx