[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] PL-300WT Tests On Going - Part One
I was/am really excited when the 300WT arrived on the scene. Beside
the DXing possibilities offered by the DSP circuitry, the fact that
it offers running numerical values of signal strength and S over
Noise offered at least the possibility of running some semi-accurate
antenna comparisons... The 300WT might be the instrument that I
needed to do some development on multi-bar ferrite antennas, etc.
I ordered one and then an additional two PL-300WTs from the Hong Kong
source and have just had time to spend about half a day with all three.
Some notes:
The three were all produced in May 2009 (sticker inside) and their
unaligned stock performance was quite similar on weak signals. There
were differences... one was always slightly better, one was always in
the middle and one was always slightly poorer, but with these three,
the performance differences were very slight.
Foolishly, I did not keep one stock and peak the antenna bar on the
other two to see how much they improved. Intuitively, the
improvement was slight, if any. As Gary and others have found, each
of my units had the coil over at the left end.
Man. peaking these things is a whole new experience, after a lifetime
of peaking up analog circuits without a varactor at work in the
circuit simultaneously with the movement of the coil. These things
have no real resonant peak.... rather, it is a plateau, or seems so
to me. There is obviously a broad range of coil inductances that the
varactor will compensate for, so the set is out of resonance at some
point (for my three, that is with the coil partly off the bar) or it
is in resonance.... as I slide the bar toward the center, there is no
change in reception, despite me making major changes in inductance
(by the sliding of the coil.)
There is less plastic in the PL-300WT than in the E-100. The ferrite
bar is only supported in a tray under the right-hand half of the
bar. The rest of the bar is suspended.... cantilevered out in space.
This is probably why they are so enthusiastic in the use of glue in
holding the bare bar onto the little tray under the right-hand
half. I was able to get two of the three antenna bars out, intact,
after breaking the first one. I did not find any "secret" to
successful bar removal.... just patience and gentleness.
The varactor makes the antenna circuit so forgiving that I found that
I could use my standard Plywood Slider boards and the coils that were
designed to work with my E100s for the PL-300WTs. I hold the radios
to the boards with Velcro and have a set-screw arrangement in the
Litz wires between the radio and the Sliding coil, so swapping radios
and getting things up and running was very easy.
In the next day or two, I'm going to do another comparison of all
three 300WT radios.... this time with all of them set up as
Sliders. I'll then pick the two most similar to use in antenna tests
and return the third one to stock status for use in the Barefoot Class.
I did make one series of comparative tests last evening.... Between
one of the PL-300WTs as an 8" Slider and my favorite TP DX ULR, an
E100 8" Slider with the vaunted $50 Murata filter aboard. I checked
the performance of the two on about 8 or ten weak signals throughout
the domestic band, using my audio switching box that can switch my
headphones back and forth instantaneously or put one radio in each
ear. The test was a real revelation..... I'll be using the PL-300WT
as my DOMESTIC DX receiver for the foreseeable future. The reception
of these weak signals was at least slightly superior on the 300WT on
each and every test frequency!!! I'll not be doing much domestic DX
out here in the Pacific NW, but I was beginning to hit difficult
times in Oklahoma with 550 domestics, so a hot new receiver will be
most welcome when I return to the Southern Prairie. The difference
between the two radios was mostly in intelligibility... The very
narrow Murata filter tends to muffle audio unless off-tuned one kHz.
and you can't really do that on a very weak signal. However, beside
the boost in intelligibility, the 300WT did also seem a bit more
sensitive, over-all.
I'm going to run a comparison between an E100 Slider without a Murata
filter and a 300WT Slider to see if I can isolate/verify the gain in
weak signal sensitivity a bit more.
Right now, I'm not convinced that the 300WT is the superior radio for
all situations of TP DXing. It certainly has the HUGE advantage of
not having to have a very difficult-to-perform IF filter transplant
to be useful with off-channel TP or TA DXing.... and useful it will
be. However, there were instances last summer and fall where the
Murata-filtered E100 just performed miracles of working in close to
domestic channels. I'm thinking of 738 and 747 and even 1 kHz. splits
where one could get useable DX signals "backing in" to the DX side of
the pile. Comparing the two sets here by just off-tuning a domestic
by two or three kHz., I seem to hear slightly less domestic splatter
with the Murata. I'm not certain that is a totally relevant test. In
truth, there is only one way to tell which can work in close the most
successfully.... a trip to Grayland :>)
So far, I've not noticed any objectionable AGC action with my three
PL-300WTs, and given the amount of weak signal work that I did
yesterday, I think that I'd have noticed, were it a problem with
these particular sets.
Back to work! More later.
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx