[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] FARDA, ctd.
Pete -
Guy's array might be pointed at 300 degrees but there's about 180 degrees of coverage in the main lobe. Since the bearing of Farda is 0 degrees, it wouldn't (and didn't!) have any trouble picking it up.
CHuck> From: ptdx@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:46:06 -0800> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [IRCA] FARDA, ctd.> > Guy Atkins recently logged Farda-1575 at 0130 GMT (6:30pm PDT) from > Grayland with his array oriented toward 300 degrees. Please pardon my > naivete on technical matters but it seems to me that at that angle, > the signal would be going through a reasonable amount of daylight > before it got here whereas if it were coming from the east, it would > be going through almost total darkness. Also isn't the hop to the > east a shorter distance? What am I missing?> > Pete Taylor> Tacoma, WA> 12225w 4719n> HQ180 + Kiwa air core loop> ICF2010 + " " " "> DX398; Palomar loop> SRF-59 & SRF M37V> > _______________________________________________> IRCA mailing list> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect !
the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx