Re: [IRCA] Max. Groundwave Propagation Distance?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Max. Groundwave Propagation Distance?



I beleive the 580 you're referring to is 5KW Day/34W Night, Non Directional
Facility WKSK West Jefferson, NC not far from the TN/VA state line.

Paul



On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:05 AM, George Sherman <georgesmn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> CBK (about 70 mi N of Regina) is surrounded by great ground & I seem to
> recall them claiming to get improved results from having double the normal
> number of ground radials? Anyway, they go 700 miles for sure on groundwave
> weakly, on a good radio. Summer reception near Park Rapids, NW MN, on a
> portable.
>
>  That 100 mi or so limit for *average* ground may be true?
>
>  WLW can be heard weakly days in SE MN, about 650 miles. Cleveland on 1100
> put a weak carrier into MN & NE daytimes, many years ago. We had a car radio
> that could get summertime mid-day reception of some Chicago stations in
> Northeastern SD, about 550 miles. WCCO is one of the strongest signals in
> parts of Eastern SD during the day 200+mi.
>
>  WNAX-570 SD day primary almost reaches Minneapolis, about 200 miles.
> Omaha on 590 very readable, almost 300 mi, on SRF-59 barefoot. Several
> Kansas City stations weakly days, almost 450 miles, with loop.
>
>  As we go up the dial WHO-1040 easily readable @ 225 miles. KXEL-1540 also
> @ 175mi.
>
>  Local KYMN-1080 on the 11 watts night, has a good groundwave strength at
> 25 miles, but some QRM most nights.
>
>  But I've been in W NC where a station on 580 had a day primary of 15-20
> miles, and a 7 mile distant graveyarder could not be detected in the mess at
> night. 73, George S., MN
>
> Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  At 01:52 AM 3/8/2008, you wrote:
> >My best distance midday reception, was KORL-650-10KW-Honolulu, HI (2500
> >miles over water) heard around 1970. KORL was mixing with KYAK-Anchorage
> >(1800 miles also over water). That would be nil to impossible today with
> >CISL there. No Sacramento CA on 650 then either. I also heard several
> >Midwesterns (WMAQ,WGN, WBBM, WLS, WHO, etc) around 1 PM Pacific time
> >back in the early 70s too. In those days I had a 600 foot longwire
> >running N/S.
> > In recent years around 2000 I logged
> >around 2PM or so in mid winter, KATQ-Plentywood MT, KFTI-Wichita KS, an
> >Houston TX. So long haul Midday Winter DX can be had.
>
>
> I guess the problem is determining what is ground wave and what is skywave
> especially during a winter day in the northern part of the USA, or any part
> of Canada. If there's any amount of fading over less than a few minutes,
> it's generally thought that there's a skywave component.
>
> There's several scientific publications that I've seen that address MF
> groundwave from a theoretical standpoint;one (NTIA Report 99-368: Medium
> Frequency Propagation Prediction Techniques and Antenna Modeling for
> Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Broadcast Applications by Nicholas
> DeMinco, available at http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/pub/ntia-rpt/99-368/)
> says "At 0.5 MHz over average ground, the ground wave predominates over
> the sky wave from the transmitter site out to distances of about 150 km,
> where
> the two signals are equal. The signals add as vectors, and destructive and
> constructive interference
> can occur. At distances beyond 150 km the sky wave is the predominant
> signal. At a signal
> frequency of 1.5 MHz, the distance where the two signals are equal reduces
> to 45 km, because of the
> increased loss at the higher frequency."
>
> Given the above figures, I'm not sure how I received CBK-540 here in
> Victoria at 2PM local on a mid-July afternoon (1PM sun time, given it was
> daylight saving time then); I wouldn't have expected much skywave then.
>
> The references in the above publication will give you a wealth of sources,
> some of them stiff with mathematics.
>
> Other publications
> http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/pub/ntia-rpt/86-203/index.php
>
> http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/reports/1978-07.pdf
>
> The FCC's AM groundwave field strength graphs:
> http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/73184/index.html
>
>
> Gordon Nelson's article, "Skywave or Groundwave Reception", National Radio
> Club reprint P9 (http://www.nrcdxas.org/) addressed the problem of
> identifying which is which for the DXer, and was an initial introduction to
> long haul groundwave propagation for me.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> *****************************
> Nick Hall-Patch
> Victoria, BC
> Canada
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo!
> Search.
>  _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>


-- 
Sincerely,
Paul B. Walker, Jr.
www.walkerbroadcasting.com
www.myspace.com/walkerbroadcasting
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx