[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] KAZ versus Pennant/Flag



Mark C, your tall DKAZ idea should work as a decent compromise. I am
surprised that the real low end seems not to provide really good F/B no
matter what I do. I changed to 30 ft high rather than 40 and while you lose
3 dB signal at 530 KHz, the pattern is somewhat better, but still not as
good as I'd like. However, higher up, per EZNEC you'll love the antenna.
73 KAZ

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:02 PM Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Craig I am surprised that JJ's are so much better on your KAZ that is
> aimed at least 40 deg from them than on your Superloop basically aimed
> right at them. Your Superloop is 45 x 20 ft so 900 sq ft under it.
>
> What is the height (bottom wire to apex) of your 72 ft KAZ?  73 KAZ
> worried something might be wrong with connections to your Superloop.
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:24 AM Mark Durenberger <Mark4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mark.  Kaz reminds us that D-KAZ Aspect Ratio is important to a
>> good
>> EZNEC result so, presumably, the same is true in real antenna life.
>>
>> One of the measurement runs I've made for the upcoming D-KAZ Cookbook
>> compared two different apex heights.
>>
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> Mark Durenberger
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Mark Connelly via
>> IRCA
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 9:47 PM
>> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Mark Connelly <markwa1ion@xxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] KAZ versus Pennant/Flag
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx