Realistically, SWLs have no economic or political influence and it is even less compared to the financial industry. Short wave broadcasting, sad to say, is considered a remnant of a bygone era super ceded by the internet and the computer. If (THE BIG IF) the technology advocated in this petition ,and there is quite a lot of technology being advocated,, actually works as it is supposed to, there is little to worry about except brief bursts of noise which are not harmful interference. The report does state that over years of testing not one verifiable interference report was received. Verifiable is defined among other things as getting the call sign of the interfering station. Getting an ID on a frequency agile brief burst of data of an unknown mode of transmission does not sound like an easy thing to do. Thanks to Arthur and Zack for their comments. Bill Smith, Douglas, MA

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/

Topic: Co-existence (page 19) says co-channel interference could occur at some times and places, but is sufficiently limited to enable preventing of harmful (harmful is in italics) interference, provided licensees are granted multiple 2-25 band frequencies . . . and licensees use frequency – agile techniques. Footnote 50: defines harmful interference as interference which endangers a radio navigation service or of other safety services, or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radio service operating in accordance with (the ITU) radio regulations. So what they are warranting is no harmful interference if they get what they need. Bill Smith, Douglas, MA

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/

Can't speak to these petitioners in particular, but many financial service companies have a history in many areas of operations of first getting the necessary licenses and then pushing the envelope. Any lawyer could drive a truck through the holes in these subjective definitions of "harmful interference." Among other things, very few SW BCs are now beamed to North America. Would these people consider themselves free to interfere with our reception of BCs intended for other parts of the world that listeners in NA consider great DX? Just asking.

Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 at 06:06:01 PM GMT+1
Subject: Jen's Eclectic Views, & Real Deal for July 23rd is up & ready

Hi Glenn, I hope everything is fine and enjoying the mid summer.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/lmkh8xdz9b3gn6r8hxyc4/Jen-s-Eclectic-Views-Real-Deal-For-7-23-Sun-UT-on-Unique.mp3?rlkey=sh669f0crlu42emgspnkj6uzm&dl=0

Here's The Live Digital Stream.
http://uk4-vn.mixstream.net:8104/index.html

Sun 1700 to 2000 UT, or start time 1800/1900 UT when specials.

Next week Sun July 30th UT is GB's look at his own musical salute to Nomad/Womad world beat music. I will finish up with some world beat filler, times to be decided on.

Then the following UT Sunday Aug. 6th 1800 to past 2200 UT, it`s time to make noise at my
annual look at the bands & artists I have played on my show & the new artists that are appearing at this year`s Rebellionfestival.

Happening in ''Swinging in the Raw England'' the first week in August.

So join us on Unique Radio, AUS
All summer long, "Smash It Up"

Jen In The Rad

73'' & 33''
&
GB. Mike.

_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/

Topic: Co-existence (page 19) says co-channel interference could occur at some times and places, but is sufficiently limited to enable preventing of harmful (harmful is in italics) interference, provided licensees are granted multiple 2-25 band frequencies . . . and licensees use frequency – agile techniques. Footnote 50: defines harmful interference as interference which endangers a radio navigation service or of other safety services, or seriously degrades, obstructs, or repeatedly interrupts a radio service operating in accordance with (the ITU) radio regulations. So what they are warranting is no harmful interference if they get what they need. Bill Smith, Douglas, MA

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

_
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/